Do you want Wyverns fighting alongside your dragoon?

[Shougun]

I'm pretty sure they are going to add beastmaster in so says some pdfs i've read.. Could just have your wyvern that way lol. There have been many odd pets under beastmaster or beastmaster like plays in FF.

[Rubieus]

Estinien is a traitor and I didn't complain because it was part of the game and in that part I got to watch him die.

[Jinrya-Geki]

Ricard had a wyvern, he didn't use it in battle, but he had one, and technically that makes him the first Dragoon in the series.

[Seirra_Lanzce]

Sure they can add in wyvern as dragoon pet but then that just make you the enemy and all the other players will hint you down.

[Raubahn]

Ricard had a wyvern, he didn't use it in battle, but he had one, and technically that makes him the first Dragoon in the series.

but the plot here is different jin in FF2 is:

The Wyvern, also known as Wind Drakes (ひりゅう, Hiryuu?), were the steeds of Deist's Dragoons, who tamed them with the help of their pendants. In order to procreate, Wyverns drop their eggs at the spring inside Deist Cavern, where they incubate until their birth, and then wait for the call of the Dragoons.

Meaning in 2 they were friendly to dragoons. but here they aren't in fact they are enemies. i don't wanna add up because alot of people told the story of XIV DRG already.

And that Wyvern in 2 was able to get summoned (Similar to Gilgamesh and Odin in FF8).

I would say if SE want to Diversify Jobs add a Light Dragoon (w/o a wyvern) and a Dark Dragoon (with Wyvern as a pet) and people will be satisfied.

[Jinrya-Geki]

Just my counter-argument to those who say that Kain is the original dragoon and he didn't have a wyvern.

In this game however, we have beastmen that are neutral, some even good. Of course there's gotta be some wyverns that may not hate us, and in fact like us? Just saying.

[Shougun]

Kain, Holy Dragoon anyone?

SE could turn the job system into a cluster f... real easy and not even break lore lol

[Andrien]

I'll give the same answer to this thread like I did to the old one. No thanks. Compromising the dragoon, and its effectiveness for a pet is not necessary.


About FF2, Ricard Highwind used a wyvern for transport only. Kain, his son didn't need one.

[Raubahn]

Just my counter-argument to those who say that Kain is the original dragoon and he didn't have a wyvern.

In this game however, we have beastmen that are neutral, some even good. Of course there's gotta be some wyverns that may not hate us, and in fact like us? Just saying.

i agree with u man
when there is evil there is good who knows

[Raubahn]

I'll give the same answer to this thread like I did to the old one. No thanks. Compromising the dragoon, and its effectiveness for a pet is not necessary.


About FF2, Ricard Highwind used a wyvern for transport only. Kain, his son didn't need one.

a FYI in FF2:

The wyvern that the player acquires casts Blaze 7 when in battle, making it the only key item in the entire series to have a function in battle and the first thing even remotely resembling a summon in the Final Fantasy series.

and why Kain didnt use any wyvern its because mountain Deist wyverns (those who a drg can tame in 2) were all killed and ricard wyvern is either dead or cant
dont get me wrong am neutral