So the Skirmish weapon can be melded.

[Rexus]

@Molly

No, not the "enter your stats HERE" thing, I meant the calculated primary/secondary stat caps area. It says Ifrits is 326STR/293VIT? That just doesn't seem right. Also, giants dps is 39.3, it's listed as 39.76.

@Meat

I think Alma meant that in like a 60 second span, Garuda's would pump out as many WS's as a 4.3s delay weapon but like 1 second faster. Or something. So Garuda would do 4 combos in like 50s while Ifrits will do 4 combos in 51s. <_<

[Molly_Millions]

@Molly

No, not the "enter your stats HERE" thing, I meant the calculated primary/secondary stat caps area. It says Ifrits is 326STR/293VIT? That just doesn't seem right.

The calculations are not my work, I only filled in the sheet with the weapon data.

Also, giants dps is 39.3, it's listed as 39.76.

nice catch, I'll fix that right now.


...actually that just changed a lot. You'd need a serious triple meld of high-end tier IVs to make anything approaching Garuda's scream. /sadface


I guess that best way to go, may just be to slap some touch of rage on one and make a tanking axe. Of course I personally won't use anything less than a double meld for that. IMO, the 'cool factor' of having one of these weapons double or triple melded remains unaffected. lol

[Meatdawg]

@Meat

I think Alma meant that in like a 60 second span, Garuda's would pump out as many WS's as a 4.3s delay weapon but like 1 second faster. Or something. So Garuda would do 4 combos in like 50s while Ifrits will do 4 combos in 51s. <_<

It's the same amount of TP so it's the same amount of WS.

[Izodius]

@Molly

No, not the "enter your stats HERE" thing, I meant the calculated primary/secondary stat caps area. It says Ifrits is 326STR/293VIT? That just doesn't seem right. Also, giants dps is 39.3, it's listed as 39.76.

The stat caps have not changed - I had to calculate the stat caps as a logarithmic curve of all known stat caps based off of wDPS - since no one knows enough stat caps for there to be an accurate formula or even an accurate curve. My first shot at the logarithmic curve was pretty shoddy to say the least - it should be MUCH closer now to the actual values.

The best way to use the sheet is to download it and manually enter the stat caps if you know them - I had to develop a way for the sheet to be used quickly by the general populace.