ATK power VS VIT

[Molly_Millions]

This is generally what I've been going off of, since it's the only testing I've seen to be pretty thorough...

The TL;DR is:

1 STR = 0.8 "damage" increase, up to 350~, then 0.25 "damage" increase
1 Secondary Stat = 0.7 "damage" increase, up to 310~, then no "damage" increase
1 Att = 0.35 "damage increase, with no max

So lets look at your situation. If you are at 279 VIT, you need about 31 more VIT to cap out. If you went this route, you'd sacrifice 40 ATT and 5 ACC. Using the above ratios we get..

31 VIT = 21.7 "damage" increase

40 ATT = 14 "damage" increase

Your WS damage will easily be better if you went the VIT route. More than likely though, your AA damage will be better using the ATT. I personally think you should go the VIT route since WAR is more WS based. Just my 2 cents, not saying I'm 100% right!

Where did you find this magical post? (the link goes to a completely different post) I use a parser fairly often these days, and although I haven't gone through and tested everything. I concluded that adding + attk added more overall damage. I didn't know the cap for VIT, my VIT is at 318 in my tanking set for example.