Ban Service Accounts with more than 1 FC house

[neia]

Nah this entire thread is about "I'm too jealous others getting gil but I'm too lazy to set it up myself so take it away from these who have it". Remember, there's no botting or cheating or hacking going on, only intended game mechanics are used. Can't ban for that.

Can implement additional restrictions, yes. Can not take out what's already there, no.


Yeah you can't punish someone for doing a cartel business in a place where it's not prohibited. I aint seeing no clause in TOS that would prohibit someone from buying tons of FCs from other players and using them to get some gil, do you see that clause?

Moreover, you not caring about something is definitely not enough of a reason to go after people.

And if we're talking here about things that make game worse for normal players, first thing we should get rid of is MSQ slop.

Again with the insults, facetious arguments, and whataboutisms - your standing has no grounding in reality. I should expect nothing less from the same person who made the suggestion to remove cast times and animation lock from LB3. It's clear you fundamentally don't really have a grasp on this game, on top of being facetious & rude.

I highly doubt devs intended for singular service accounts to hoard FC plots, locking other players out.

The mental gymnastics you are performing to protect the 0.01% of the population who have hoarded FC plots is astonishing, but understandable if you benefit yourself from the status quo. If you don't stand to benefit and you still think this way, perhaps you should try a single player game, it sounds like that's what you'd prefer to play.

[Evo1171]

Nah this entire thread is about "I'm too jealous others getting gil but I'm too lazy to set it up myself so take it away from these who have it". Remember, there's no botting or cheating or hacking going on, only intended game mechanics are used. Can't ban for that.

Can implement additional restrictions, yes. Can not take out what's already there, no.


Yeah you can't punish someone for doing a cartel business in a place where it's not prohibited. I aint seeing no clause in TOS that would prohibit someone from buying tons of FCs from other players and using them to get some gil, do you see that clause?

Moreover, you not caring about something is definitely not enough of a reason to go after people.

And if we're talking here about things that make game worse for normal players, first thing we should get rid of is MSQ slop.

https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes.../housing_land/

You can find the rule under "Temporary Changes to Purchasing Land" which has been in effect since patch 4.2.

Msq has nothing to do with what we're talking about.

[Aelin_Ashryver]

Sophia/free company; 1804 plots match your current filters.

"We're all gona make it brah."



Welcome, welcome, and feel free to check the old servers too
Poor chaos has seen busier times...

Ykno I have jus been living in light since I started the game, maybe getting a little foothold in chaos would be nice. I'll need to decide what race to be, main is hrothy, then I have alt miqo and au'ra.. maybe a hyur?

Also wards not having been unlocked on certain servers just proves my point, supply is fine

[Alicie]

Again with the insults, facetious arguments, and whataboutisms - your standing has no grounding in reality. I should expect nothing less from the same person who made the suggestion to remove cast times and animation lock from LB3. It's clear you fundamentally don't really have a grasp on this game, on top of being facetious & rude.

I highly doubt devs intended for singular service accounts to hoard FC plots, locking other players out.

The mental gymnastics you are performing to protect the 0.01% of the population who have hoarded FC plots is astonishing, but understandable if you benefit yourself from the status quo. If you don't stand to benefit and you still think this way, perhaps you should try a single player game, it sounds like that's what you'd prefer to play.

But... it's not me being rude and having no grasp on the game, it's you...?

If devs did not intended one player to own multiple FC houses, they would have either removed that possibility completely or added a clause into their TOS about it being specifically prohibited. Yet we don't see either.

You can not ask for a ban. There is no grounds for it. You can only ask to implement technical limitations or a prohibition via TOS.

https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes.../housing_land/

You can find the rule under "Temporary Changes to Purchasing Land" which has been in effect since patch 4.2.

Msq has nothing to do with what we're talking about.

"Temporary changes" doesn't sounds like rules. Doesn't covers acquisition via purchasing from other players either. Perfectly within TOS, I don't know why people are complaining here.

[neia]

Also wards not having been unlocked on certain servers just proves my point, supply is fine

This is an insane take, doesn't hold whatsoever, and is proof that you're not seriously engaging in this debate. You're just happy to benefit from greedy hoarding, and coming in here to stifle discussion with misinformation.

[Aelin_Ashryver]

This is an insane take, doesn't hold whatsoever, and is proof that you're not seriously engaging in this debate. You're just happy to benefit from greedy hoarding.

The wards are sitting there waiting till there is enough demand to justify unlocking them. There's not enough demand so locked they shall stay. That simple really. If they unlocked them you would just see more people buying out all the smalls slowly because THERE IS NOT ENOUGH DEMAND and as such the sub farmers can take their time taking all the small unwanted plots. Because most FC's have a home at this point, many are just wanting to upgrade to a larger size.

Stay mad and homeless I guess. I've made my points, you're just too salty to accept reality.

[neia]

But... it's not me being rude and having no grasp on the game, it's you...?
You can not ask for a ban. There is no grounds for it. You can only ask to implement technical limitations or a prohibition via TOS.

Yeah this doesn't track. Every single one of your points has been calmly dismantled & the vast majority of the people coming into this thread clearly do not agree with you.

But sure resume the personal attacks because you have an indefensible position on the topic.

[Evo1171]

But... it's not me being rude and having no grasp on the game, it's you...?

If devs did not intended one player to own multiple FC houses, they would have either removed that possibility completely or added a clause into their TOS about it being specifically prohibited. Yet we don't see either.

You can not ask for a ban. There is no grounds for it. You can only ask to implement technical limitations or a prohibition via TOS.



"Temporary changes" doesn't sounds like rules. Doesn't covers acquisition via purchasing from other players either. Perfectly within TOS, I don't know why people are complaining here.

Just because you think something doesn't "sound" like a rule doesn't mean it doesn't apply, and I don't care about acquisition from other players, it's about having more than one fc house per service account per world, which as you can see it explicitly states you can purchase and MAINTAIN one fc house per world per service account.

[neia]

The wards are sitting there waiting till there is enough demand to justify unlocking them. There's not enough demand so locked they shall stay. That simple really. If they unlocked them you would just see more people buying out all the smalls slowly because THERE IS NOT ENOUGH DEMAND and as such the sub farmers can take their time taking all the small unwanted plots. Because most FC's have a home at this point, many are just wanting to upgrade to a larger size.

Stay mad and homeless I guess. I've made my points, you're just too salty to accept reality.

Another insane take that has no factual basis. Unlocking wards is not inherently tied to demand at all, there literally does not exist any in-game mechanic that unlocks wards at a certain demand, you're making things up to support your indefensible position. The one or two FC plots that maybe come up each week on Materia routinely have 60+ bids each.

Also nice, once again resorting to personal attacks, because once again, your position is indefensible and not grounded in reality. Stay greedy & rude, I guess.

[Aelin_Ashryver]

Another insane take that has no factual basis. Unlocking wards is not inherently tied to demand at all, there literally does not exist any in-game mechanic that unlocks wards at a certain demand, you're making things up to support your indefensible position. The one or two FC plots that maybe come up each week on Materia routinely have 60+ bids each.

Also nice, once again resorting to personal attacks, because once again, your position is indefensible and not grounded in reality. Stay greedy & rude, I guess.

I'm sure they've said before the wards will be unlocked when needed, or something to that affect. But I can't be bothered to hunt out a quote so take it or leave it. But the implication is there and obvious. Why would you unlock hundreds of extra plots for 60-100 people looking for shared housing?. One house will service multiple of those 60 bidders. So you just prove again, there's not enough people actually in need of a plot to warrant unlocking those wards. Good job.