Feature Suggestion: Contracts (name pending)

[Gwenkatsu]

As much as I like this idea, as soon as you introduce "soft" targets (which cannot be confirmed by a system event), you run into trouble:

- Completion verified via dual confirmation or system event (e.g., duty clear).
- “Teach me Reaper rotation” turns into a Mentor’s Trial.

Check out Jerry Smith and the Meeseeks to see where this sort of request might end

[Shistar]

omg yes, implement ingame NFT

Huh?? LOL How would this become a non-fungible token..? You're just paying someone to help you, same way you pay mercenaries in PF to help you get a mount.
Unless this is a joke, in which case whoops, went right over my head.

As much as I like this idea, as soon as you introduce "soft" targets (which cannot be confirmed by a system event), you run into trouble:

Check out Jerry Smith and the Meeseeks to see where this sort of request might end

Yeah, if it's something the game can confirm by itself I'm all for it, but stuff like soft targets could lead to a lot of trouble. I think it would still be worth adding for specific targets such as duty completion, crafters/gatherers for hire, etc.

[Soverus]

As much as I like this idea, as soon as you introduce "soft" targets (which cannot be confirmed by a system event), you run into trouble:



Check out Jerry Smith and the Meeseeks to see where this sort of request might end

Mind giving me some examples of "soft targets"?

[Gwenkatsu]

Mind giving me some examples of "soft targets"?

As I quoted from your post: "Teach me how to play reaper", then the client turns out to be absolutely incapable of playing reaper, no matter how long or good you explain it to them. Maybe they're daft, or maybe you're a terrible teacher - this contract will never be finished.