Stuff like THIS is the reason Housing is a Joke -- SE please do something about this!

[Asari5]

housing for fc only including a member minimum you need according to the house size. that would solve it. but i guess people wouldnt like it.

rent... so people have to put thought into it if its really worth to get a house. especially the ones standing around empty anyway because the owner is too lazy... also gil sink.
but i guess people wouldnt like it.

there are limited houses around and i think its pretty obvious thats not gonna change. but if something is limited its gonna need something forcing down the demand. if people like it or not


and of course only one house per account. dont know why thats not a thing

[SophiaDL]

housing for fc only including a member minimum you need according to the house size. that would solve it. but i guess people wouldnt like it.

rent... so people have to put thought into it if its really worth to get a house. especially the ones standing around empty anyway because the owner is too lazy... also gil sink.
but i guess people wouldnt like it.

there are limited houses around and i think its pretty obvious thats not gonna change. but if something is limited its gonna need something forcing down the demand. if people like it or not


and of course only one house per account. dont know why thats not a thing

rent... so people have to put thought into it if its really worth to get a house. especially the ones standing around empty anyway because the owner is too lazy... also gil sink.
but i guess people wouldnt like it.

Are we imitating real life then ? Because if that's the case, then multiowning should continue to be allowed since its a thing in real life. Also rent would only punish the casuals that dont play much, not multiowners, but this isnt even about multiowners, this is about "wow this person hasnt got their house decorated, it should be mine" because somehow you feel entitled to someone else's house that they struggled for with the horrible housing system.

only one house per account. dont know why thats not a thing

Nope, even if you removed every house from multiowners or from casual players that have 2 or 3 houses (there's a lot), there still wouldnt be anywhere near as many houses as the game needs to have one for everyone, but as I said above, this is all about entitlement so there's not really a need to go further down that part of your post, work as hard as the multiowners do and you'll have it, or sit and complain about them, your choice really.

Instead of trying to actually fix the issue by adding dynamic ward housing which would create houses so everyone can at the very least get a small, the community prefers to attack its own and try to be vultures to try and take people's houses, great community btw.

And no, instanced housing is not an option, that boring concept can stay on other games.

[hydralus]

Y'know they had a really good chance to move to instanced housing with island sanctuary it's kinda funny they didn't.

[Mimilu]

Y'know they had a really good chance to move to instanced housing with island sanctuary it's kinda funny they didn't.

Sadly, houses and demolition timers are part of how the devs keep people subscribed, the more time, effort, and coin (real or fake) you put into the game, the harder it can be to leave for some people. (◍´͈ꈊ`͈◍)