Quote Originally Posted by PotatoePet View Post
So privacy of users isn't important as long as you get what you want.

Its still sent to the clients, so wireshark is enough. All you are asking for, and here it becomes very ironic, is: "providing the fragile illusion of safety"

I already said this before but seems like you weren't able to understand that.
Look, if I want someone to condescend to me and put words in my mouth, I'll call my mother, not you.

I want this basic safety functionality improved. The implementation can be changed to be more secure, and the devs are probably already working on ways to do so. The specific implementation is not what this thread is about. It is about the end result of that improvement, not the myriad ways bad actors can work around it.

I've already said this before, but it seems that you were unwilling to comprehend that.