
Originally Posted by
Khryseis_Astra
Instanced doesn’t need to be subject to auto-demo because it’s not a limited resource like a ward plot. If a ward plot wasn’t demoed, that unused plot is both keeping others from owning a plot as well as taking up server resources to keep it permanently loaded in its neighborhood. Instanced only loads when in use, and doesn’t keep anyone else from getting their own instanced plot. Makes perfect sense… the ward housing comes with the risk of auto-demo, so the only reason to go for one would be truly liking the neighborhood aesthetic, wanting to have venues, all the other reasons people prefer ward housing. Those who just want a place to call their own and decorate, who don’t care about visibility, or even more importantly those who just get a plot for FOMO can choose the instanced version, giving everyone a plot that will always be there for them. If they ever actually created instanced alongside the wards, I think there would probably be a pretty even split, and those choosing instanced would leave more space for those that prefer the wards.
Should the ward housing have “better” features? No. The whole point of instanced is to offer an alternative that is functionally the same. But the reality of the issue is that instanced housing can support more features than ward housing can. The limitations are holding them back. It’s why the Island can have 100 outdoor furnishings, while a ward mansion gets like 40? It’s why we’re getting interior remodeling and the possibility of upgrading the interior size, because the insides are instanced. There’s so much variety and innovation we’re missing out on. Yes the neighborhood idea is cute and some will always prefer it. But we need more added alongside that. Not just for the lack of supply, but to keep to their goal of being able to compete with other games for another decade. Older games already offer more housing variety, without even requiring a sub. We pay a sub, we should have more options.