The issue with Dawntrail and importance of 8.0

[Archeron]

When someone has presented a fact I have addressed it. Typically their interpretation of the fact is not my interpretation of the fact and I disagree with their interpretation. Not agreeing with an interpretation is not the same as dismissing it. I don't engage with every point thrown my way but nobody here does.

I don't think I've called anyone here "unconstructive". I don't know why you brought up being constructive several times like that as if that's something I'm asking people to be.

I'm not going to engage with anything else in your post because you're being rude !! In your post you said it's best not to engage with rude comments because then I'd be the bigger person, but tbh I've been openly sticking to that policy for a while now and you chastised me for it and called it dismissive. I'm not sure what you want so I'm going to forge my own path !!

Anyway once again to get back on topic, Dawntrail was great. I like the trajectory the story took and the feeling of unease surrounding certain elements that remain in the story (the endless, the regulators, the key). I would have liked that unease to be greater emphasized in the climax of 7.0 but I'm glad 7.1 is jumping right back into it.

If you're not going to engage with my post because it was rude why did you reply into the first place? Just proving my point about your real intentions here.

You sure this isn't... to quote a favorite phrase you like to use... your own "reading comprehension" issue?

I pointed out why two communties were fighting, (On a seperate thread) and multiple people took that as me suggesting a course of action, like that the Hardcore players should be responsible for carrying casuals, and that I somehow wanted harder content to be deleted. Reading comprehension = Still a problem.

[Lilapop]

If you're not going to engage with my post because it was rude why did you reply into the first place? Just proving my point about your real intentions here.

If they're replying to your post, that is the engagement. Replying is engagement. Reading comprehension, anyone?

[Supersnow845]

If they're replying to your post, that is the engagement. Replying is engagement. Reading comprehension, anyone?

Replying to a post saying “not engaging with that” is not engagement just because they technically replied to your comment

What a pointless distinction

[Lilapop]

Replying to a post saying “not engaging with that” is not engagement just because they technically replied to your comment

What a pointless distinction

If it's still fostering conversation (which, in this context, it clearly is) that is engagement.