
Having a better understanding of the words you're reading helps. But keep refreshing and rubbing your eyes, I'm sure you'll get there.


Typically when someone disagrees with a provided description, they provide their own and why they think so. Y'know, basic constructive conversation. But seeing as how you consider "Lol. Lmao even." a constructive contribution, I'm not surprised you react this way.

I'm sorry, but when someone hops in here and effectively says, "Don't mess with us casual players, Jack, because we built this game from the ground up and, if you piss us off, we can just as easily destroy it," apropos of nothing and you unironically follow up with, "Well, actually, she has some good points," how would you prefer I react to that?
Last edited by NamiRocket; 01-05-2025 at 06:02 AM.


Their delivery was out of line but the premise is objectively true, no? Not like the casual playerbase is under one big united umbrella to actually make something like that happen, but for every raider there's at least a dozen casuals. How I expect is if you're going to try to refute me at least it in good faith and not just go "facepalm moment lmao"I'm sorry, but when someone hops in here and effectively says, "Don't mess with us casual players, Jack, because we built this game from the ground up and, if you piss us off, we can just as easily destroy it," apropos of nothing and you unironically follow up with, "Well, actually, she has some good points," how would you prefer I react to that?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

