Quote Originally Posted by W00by View Post
This gives mad "my girlfriend goes to another school. You wouldn't know her though. And you don't go to that school so you can't prove she doesn't exist" energy.

By a purely scientific definition, yes, I cannot PROVE you are bad if your logs aren't public (even though the ones that are don't look great). But I can make an educated guess -- a "hypothesis," if we're being scientific -- about the absence of something (skill in this case) when there's an absence of evidence, and you getting kinda salty about it makes me feel even more assured in that conclusion. Post the vid!!!



Right? It's so obvious. I could say "I'm definitely a doctor so you should trust my medical opinion. But I won't show you my doctorate. You can definitely trust that it exists though. I went 'try-hard' in Med School."

(i really should stop but they make it easy)
You guys are unironically the most smooth brain people on this forum. First of all, by your own metric I've passed your test. So there shouldn't even be a debate about that. Second, and I cannot be more clear about this YOU CANNOT USE INCOMPLETE DATA WITHOUT CONTEXT AS PROOF OF SKILL. This is literally the "I've dipped a cup into the ocean. There are no fish in the cup, so I've concluded there are no fish in the ocean" scenario.

You are not nearly as smart as you think you are, my guy.