I'm mostly always serious. Not mad or nothin' Just pointing out contradictions/hypocrisy in the story where I see it.
*sips tea out of soul powered tea kettle*





I'm mostly always serious. Not mad or nothin' Just pointing out contradictions/hypocrisy in the story where I see it.
*sips tea out of soul powered tea kettle*
(Signature portrait by Amaipetisu)
"I thought that my invincible power would hold the world captive, leaving me in a freedom undisturbed. Thus night and day I worked at the chain with huge fires and cruel hard strokes. When at last the work was done and the links were complete and unbreakable, I found that it held me in its grip." - Rabindranath Tagore
Don't mind some of us, just following in the dear steps of our boy Emet Selch.
I don't agree with TC. But all quests in the game are 'canon' even if optional content. The WoL in the abstract 100% does all the raid storylines optional or not, and they're looking at the consistency of that character as presented in the full experience of the game.This doesn't really make sense. If your entire argument hinges on optional content, there is no "our hypocrisy". It's just yours. So a topic title adjustment seems appropriate here.
Secondly, there is hypocrisy in the raid story but it's moreso surrounding the apparent disgust at taking the WoL's soul. Isn't that kinda what their whole society is predicated around? Not just people who die of natural causes, but people who are killed by their army. This is kind of like feeling better about eating cow meat because didn't personally kill it. But that's not what Black Cat says, she's just weirdly being hypocritical.
Not that it matters because the raid itself is optional content. So ultimately I'm not sure what the purpose of the topic is. "You might be a hypocrite"??
But that's to be expected when your agenda is absolving everyone in the story except the protagonists.
I also don't have a strong recollection of relic quests but hunting beasts or otherwise antagonistic forces is false equivalency to something like plundering entire worlds of innocent people.
I think some of this is intended though. Considering how against using souls the WOL is yet it being brought up in the raid storyline, this is likely being set up to explore things further in the story. Though we won't know for sure until it continues in later patches. But considering our explicit goal is to free all the souls held by the Arcadion organization it doesn't seem like a stretch to me to think regulator use is going to be brought up too, especially with the miqo kid asking us to wear one etc.
I wanted an adventure that wasn't a retread of things i've done before but worse in every way. You know exactly what im talking about. So! A memory driven "trance" user fighters' tournament with an underbelly of corruption and exploitation? This sounds like an adventure i want to get to the bottom of. If you don't have this sentiment i'd imagine you are a failure to Azem's will.



Ever since the Ala Mhigo boss with the soul extractions it seems that the writers want to continue to explore it further.I don't agree with TC. But all quests in the game are 'canon' even if optional content. The WoL in the abstract 100% does all the raid storylines optional or not, and they're looking at the consistency of that character as presented in the full experience of the game.
I think some of this is intended though. Considering how against using souls the WOL is yet it being brought up in the raid storyline, this is likely being set up to explore things further in the story. Though we won't know for sure until it continues in later patches. But considering our explicit goal is to free all the souls held by the Arcadion organization it doesn't seem like a stretch to me to think regulator use is going to be brought up too, especially with the miqo kid asking us to wear one etc.
We had the whole sundering of souls, echo users and their origin, got a deeper understanding of the voidsent and their practices and even had our own soul ripped out.
I agree and hope that the raid story goes further into detail because there is still the infos contradicting each other.
We learn that when a voidsent does the souls are set free and the voidsent is at risk to fall victim to its prior prey.
Solution 9 implies though that the souls after extracting the memory are used up to patch the users own one and Eutrope wants to use our soul too for that.
There is clearly still stuff to learn and I hope the devs actually care as much as we do for that.
I think the whole souls thing can be used for further plots and danger to our WoL.
The whole losing our soul risk in Arcadian is actually a pretty high risk for us and I wouldn’t be surprised if there would be some kind of WoL clone we fight later against (remember the add phase in the Nald’thal fight).
The whole soul lore could be it’s own thread with how fascinating it is tbh.





I think when it gets to the point of transformation then that's when it becomes a problem. We saw that with Zoraal Ja. The hunter who used a feral soul got a light in her eyes but remained in her form. All of the fighters we faced changed their forms. And we know from what we know about tempering that it's when someone transforms that their aether has been changed beyond fixing.The whole Arcadion plot contradict the msq. "using a beast soul too much kills you"...
Meanwhile in the msq the queen explicitly explain that the regulators take care of that problem and purify the souls.
A much as she lies, that is the one thing that doesn't makes sense. She does care about her subjects, she should know ; either because victims never because endless or simply because it's been eons and she never saw one alive or dead again.
They can't really pulls a "the owner was the super-admin more powerful with all the secrets"
Another plot hole : every player in your team are dead, and their characters should be deleted at the end of the raid serie. That or they already harvested all the souls of WoLs across the multiverse.

I think Sphene sees becoming an Endless the same as saving people. This is why she doesn't care whether they wear the regulator or not. She doesn't care if reusing human or beast souls affect the person. When they are part of the cloud they are eternally saved to her. While they don't say people without regulators are "uploaded" I can only assume they are since this is obviously part of Sphene's idea on saving people. Basically when she says she wants to save her people, I believe she means it in the same way as when you save content to your computer. So how these people live or die doesn't matter to her as much since they will all be "saved" eventually.The whole Arcadion plot contradict the msq. "using a beast soul too much kills you"...
Meanwhile in the msq the queen explicitly explain that the regulators take care of that problem and purify the souls.
A much as she lies, that is the one thing that doesn't makes sense. She does care about her subjects, she should know ; either because victims never because endless or simply because it's been eons and she never saw one alive or dead again.
They can't really pulls a "the owner was the super-admin more powerful with all the secrets"
Another plot hole : every player in your team are dead, and their characters should be deleted at the end of the raid serie. That or they already harvested all the souls of WoLs across the multiverse.
If she cares so deeply about her subjects, then why doesn't she encourage the boy with the sickness to leave? Not being constantly exposed to lightening would be a great help to him I'm sure. But then she can't "save" him to the cloud after he dies so she would not encourage this.
Last edited by Gortys; 07-29-2024 at 11:53 PM.
Is it really hypocrisy if Adbert consented to rejoining his soul to you to save his world, and yours? Ignoring that the stakes are far higher than cheering crowds, and Ardbert was a shade in a cursed existence where none other could even perceive or interact with him, isn't consent kind of an important difference? I doubt any of the Feral Souls gave the "a okay" to be used like this, and the gladiators certainly didn't consent to having their souls extinguished and dying alone and in pain.





Ardbert's will was to feed into Minfilia to help stop The Flood of Light along with his fellow Warriors of Darkness. He was denied this, because she knew he had to be fed to the WoL in order for the WoL to kill Emet-selch thanks to Hydaelyn knowing about the time loop.
He was denied this without explanation, essentially forcing him to watch and move along with the WoL throughout Shadowbringers after 100 years of being a lonely shade, not allowed to return to the lifestream.
Yes, he offers himself willingly in the end, but there's quite enough there to argue that he was forced to do it as his only other choice was to let the WoL die. This is more or less coercion by authority. Ardbert's volition was disregarded 100 years prior to SHB.
And this particular story beat saw most of the playerbase coming to exclaim that the new expansions should feature us going around to the shards, gobbling up Azem's other soul shards, shard people be damned.
(Signature portrait by Amaipetisu)
"I thought that my invincible power would hold the world captive, leaving me in a freedom undisturbed. Thus night and day I worked at the chain with huge fires and cruel hard strokes. When at last the work was done and the links were complete and unbreakable, I found that it held me in its grip." - Rabindranath Tagore



The way I see it, experiences have caused our WOL to see things differently than they did before. Growing and learning isn't hypocrisy unless there's no change in behaviour.
If the WOL once again does something that uses souls as a commodity after this, then yeah. That's when the hypocrisy starts.
Edit: You have to keep in mind that with DT the writers seem to want to ignore past lore and there will absolutely be inconsistencies like this. Do I like that fact? No. But I've started the process of making peace with it.
Last edited by CamuiKushi; 07-30-2024 at 02:00 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




