Good. That'll offset the people spamming perfect scores with such insightful reviews as "Not great, but still good" and "I liked it" and "people are dumb for giving it a low score so I'm giving it a 10".
Goes both ways.
There are still people take Metacritic seriously? Huh. Wonders never cease, eh?
C-cabal? Why would you insinuate others are in a cult? It certainly threatens the credibility of what you say, if nothing else it'd tick people off enough that they'd just not listen to what you say regardless of the contents of one's speech.
Last edited by MarianneviBrittania; 07-07-2024 at 10:27 AM.
I take it none of you had the (dis)pleasure of meeting Striker44.There are still people take Metacritic seriously? Huh. Wonders never cease, eh?
C-cabal? Why would you insinuate others are in a cult? It certainly threatens the credibility of what you say, if nothing else it'd tick people off enough that they'd just not listen to what you say regardless of the contents of one's speech.
I don't agree. Reviews are a subjective experience. If YOU don't engage with that content, it shouldn't affect your score. If someone is a cutscene skipper and really enjoys the next battle content, I wouldn't blame them for giving Dawntrail a great score. You wouldn't ask them to rate the story, and their review would still be valid as it gives insight into other aspects of the game.
It's the same with streamers, you kinda know at all times that the major review outlets and streamers were put on the media tour where they got wined, dined, and gassed up by reps from SE, so they're going to rave about how great it is for about 6 months.
Dawntrail has flaws but it is not a 6.9... this is why I can't take user scores seriously, too often hijacked by bandwagons and trolls
I remember when Breath of the Wild had a low 7 when it came out for user score
Typically in reviews the reviewer is expected to play through the game in order to give a review. If I skipped all the cut scenes but only reviewed the end game content that wouldn't be a fair review either. I'm not saying they have to go out and clear an ultimate to judge the expansion, but at least expecting people to see the normal raids is fair. Even the most casual player will likely be doing the first normal raids.I don't agree. Reviews are a subjective experience. If YOU don't engage with that content, it shouldn't affect your score. If someone is a cutscene skipper and really enjoys the next battle content, I wouldn't blame them for giving Dawntrail a great score. You wouldn't ask them to rate the story, and their review would still be valid as it gives insight into other aspects of the game.
I think a 6 is pretty fair. 3/10 story, 9/10 gameplay.
My very first thought when I finished it was that it's worse than ARR. Like all expansions, 7.0 is not devoid of highs but it does seem to leave the worst impression. Easily.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.