One point I keep coming back to is how they often want to make a point for the sake of making a point, even if it's not logical.
The most egregious one is Wuk Lamat's motivation to maintain peace and the game’s insistence that she is the best candidate for this particular prospect.
I haven’t finished the story yet (beat the first trial) and I assume that all siblings will end up as co-rulers with their respective strengths complementing each other but the message that the way she wants peace is somehow unique and better compared to Koana and makes her special just makes no sense.
She wants to achieve her goal of maintaining peace for Tural by stopping her warmonger brother (understandable) but if that's the case she could also have rallied behind Koana and supported his bid for the throne.
This is how I feel every time we cross paths with Koana's team and then I'm not allowed to go with them and I just watch them walk away:
![]()
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.