AI and the future of FFXIV.

[MrKyo]

Hey investors of the AI sector: Refuting points with things like 'that's what feedback is for' when you know very well that feedback would not effect systems that deteriorate the enjoyment of the product if the entire product is mishandled by over indulging in the systems deacribed js pseudo-intellectualism, you need to study more.

The idea is that the less a human mind tackles what'a going on the less a human mind will seek relation or enjoyment. I didn't think you were dull enough to escape the idea that this game is very art heavy.

Go back to your competitor forum or cheek some more bitcoin strongarming into people unknowing.

With that being said there is no conspiracy here to be bashing. I'm certain all of you overfilter your selfies . There is genuinely no enjoyment to behold in one specific, super-franchise that competes with this game and it's due to the large allocation of completely AI maintained generation. It's nkt a very immersive World and the Craft and War aspect of it are like copy-pasting what was likely perceived by AI scrapers as popular mechanics of genre: MMORPG. I'd hate to see that happen here. Inspiration is one thing but a keen acuity can discern between what was designed and automated.

Automation should exist but not be the entirety.

The funny gif of the drone weapon compared to the human is true, electricity hurts so something maintained by it to hurt will hurt more. Imagine that.

[MrKyo]

- And for some reason these are a few of the same accounts from a thread I posted 2 years ago that started slamming racial slurs at eachother to have it completely deleted.

Shower.

[Jeeqbit]

Refuting points with things like 'that's what feedback is for' when you know very well that feedback would not effect systems that deteriorate the enjoyment of the product if the entire product is mishandled by over indulging in the systems deacribed js pseudo-intellectualism, you need to study more.

That depends very much on if Yoshi-P continued to be in charge and do live letters. He listens. So if all the players complained and said "the AI has resulted in a lackluster product", he'd probably dwell on that himself, agree with it and make adjustments.

The idea is that the less a human mind tackles what'a going on the less a human mind will seek relation or enjoyment.

I understand that and agree, but ultimately, it doesn't mean they shouldn't speed up their processes and take advantage of modern technology.

I've wanted to code something that would have taken me 24 hours, but I wanted it done now. I went to an AI chatbox and wrote a giant, rocket-science paragraph. As I was writing each sentence, I understood what I was writing, but each sentence was so complex, it was incomprehensible trying to read it back. When I read the paragraph back to myself as a whole, it was so complicated that I could not even understand what I had written. But the AI did, and it generated all the code for me exactly as I described, and it worked. The issues with AI usually come from prompts being too small.

We didn't entirely disagree on this point, as you mentioned they should speed up their processes.

Automation should exist but not be the entirety.

See, my post doesn't even really disagree with you. I am just more optimistic than you seem to be about the developers' ability to draw the line, or correct it if they cross it.