Results 1 to 10 of 101

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Atelier-Bagur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    3,980
    Character
    Cordelia Emery
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 82
    Quote Originally Posted by Boblawblah View Post
    I think it's more "I've got where I am using this garbage system and I'd be frustrated if they let everyone have what I have with a better system."

    For some, seeing everyone having large houses would devalue large houses in their opinion. I personally would love to see everyone have whatever house they want but I also haven't spent thousands of extra dollars on extra accounts/subs to have more houses.
    If some of these posters just admit to that because thats clearly whats going on, id have a lot more respect to the honesty instead of trying to play these verbal logistics into why the current system shouldnt be changed.
    (3)

  2. #2
    Player
    Ascended_Demon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Old Sharlayan
    Posts
    140
    Character
    Roeganstyr Niufyrsyn
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Pictomancer Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Atelier-Bagur View Post
    If some of these posters just admit to that because thats clearly whats going on, id have a lot more respect to the honesty instead of trying to play these verbal logistics into why the current system shouldnt be changed.
    I have a theory, may be completely off base, but perhaps a portion of the anti-instanced housing crew are folks who are gaming the current system and using shell FCs to own multiple plots. Like, we're on the same world, I'm sure you've noticed FC wards with plots all owned by FCs with the same tag that all admit to being part of the same group. There are people who admit to it, creating FCs to own plots in FC only wards. There are also people who say that to them it brings them satisfaction, owning all those plots just because it's like a "high score" to them. Obviously people like that might be opposed to instanced housing because it "devalues" their high score because then anyone could have a house.

    All I hear is them saying "you all wanted a fair system now it is, deal with it." in regards to lottery and ignoring the primary complaint that remains scarcity or lack of accessibility.
    (4)

  3. #3
    Player Stormpeaks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    2,668
    Character
    Maya Jcb
    World
    Halicarnassus
    Main Class
    Dancer Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Ascended_Demon View Post
    I have a theory, may be completely off base, but perhaps a portion of the anti-instanced housing crew are folks who are gaming the current system and using shell FCs to own multiple plots. Like, we're on the same world, I'm sure you've noticed FC wards with plots all owned by FCs with the same tag that all admit to being part of the same group. There are people who admit to it, creating FCs to own plots in FC only wards. There are also people who say that to them it brings them satisfaction, owning all those plots just because it's like a "high score" to them. Obviously people like that might be opposed to instanced housing because it "devalues" their high score because then anyone could have a house.

    All I hear is them saying "you all wanted a fair system now it is, deal with it." in regards to lottery and ignoring the primary complaint that remains scarcity or lack of accessibility.
    All I hear is them saying "you all wanted a fair system now it is, deal with it.
    And that's exactly what people asked for and was going to "save housing" and "make it fair"

    There it is.

    Enjoy.
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player
    Ascended_Demon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Old Sharlayan
    Posts
    140
    Character
    Roeganstyr Niufyrsyn
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Pictomancer Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormpeaks View Post
    And that's exactly what people asked for and was going to "save housing" and "make it fair"

    There it is.

    Enjoy.
    Mhmm. Sure.
    (3)