Eh, the story wasn't as good as previous ones though I do like some of the parallels with XI. And I'm maybe a little bit smug about my correct pronunciation of Dynamis all these years, thank you very much to everyone who I ever argued with in my old linkshells about it.
But there are some forced elements that always rub me the wrong way. For example, SE really wants us to hate Zenos, and frankly, I agreed with him about a LOT of things that were going on with the leadership of the three nations. He was right, and there was no dialogue option to acknowledge it because SE is going to tell their story whether you like it or not, and they've decided that Zenos is bad. Our only two dialogue options in *this* story with this character that we've been intimately linked to for multiple expansions now boiled down to "I don't like you" and "I don't like you, but meaner" when I was SCREAMING in my head, oh nice, someone I actually respect, totally on board to join forces to eliminate the threat and get back to our regularly scheduled rivalry.
This happens a lot in storytelling - the authors accidentally create a character that they intend to be unlikable and sometimes that character is more compelling to the reader than the intended heroes. For me this is one of those cases. I'm sick to death of Estinien and Thancred, and wish that we had actual choices in the storyline that could affect our personal versions of the story. My WoL wouldn't have dismissed Zenos outright.
That's not as easy in an MMO when they have a specific end goal, but I feel like there is a sweet spot between "I don't like you"\"I don't like you, but meaner" and complete betrayal of current allies. There's a lot of gray area to be explored, there.
But on the whole, I don't feel like there was less effort here, just perhaps a less compelling subject matter this time around.


Reply With Quote




