Can we insert negative consequences for stacking jobs in FL?

[Valence]

In before someone starts the "just remove battle high" chant. xD

I'm not fond how battle high helps snowball even more but on the other hand it rewards good play and generates a build up you can work on at the start of games. I think it could be better to actually give drawbacks to it, like reduced DR, and/or a lot more penalty tactical points when you die with a BH, and the higher the more points the team loses. I'm especially fonder of the later because it directly plays into giving the loser an advantage to catch up, and would make anti BH5 jobs even more valued.

Make it so that DRK's invulnerability is pierced by other Limit Breaks. Now we don't have to deal with the meatgrinder of Triple Sky Shatter anymore because Marksman's Spite says hi.

So as soon as you pop LD, you have a MCH, or a NIN, or a SAM, or a SMN, or another DRK, or a DRG, or a WhM, or a GNB, or a MNK, or a RDM just insta kill you.

[Mawlzy]

Battle high may be the last, best hope to actually encourage people to engage in fights. Although that'll likely never happen on Shatter.

[Elfidan]

I think it could be better to actually give drawbacks to it, like reduced DR, and/or a lot more penalty tactical points when you die with a BH, and the higher the more points the team loses.

Yeah, I'm not sure how it's survived so long with no drawbacks. It's kind of a weird break from traditional SE design.

Battle high may be the last, best hope to actually encourage people to engage in fights. Although that'll likely never happen on Shatter.

I've been doing a bit of testing and I found it easier to encourage pvp by playing tank jobs and ccing targets and groups for people to scoot in and burst on. It's something at least.