Quote Originally Posted by Thurmnmurmn View Post
I didn't read your post so I have no opinion on your stance since I don't know what it is. But for a more concrete answer for you, it's an attack on the length of your posts, not you as an individual.
The insanity thing was because people have always told you your posts are too long and they don't read them. You continue to do it then get mad when people don't read them. It's a cycle that you continue doing.
You probably haven't been paying attention, but I made short posts.

Know what happened?

People said they weren't going to read them, either.

Except one person. He read them. And said I was implying things unsaid, so attacked me for the things he imagined I implied by not writing out my full thoughts in detail.

Quote Originally Posted by ZephyrMenodora View Post
Sometimes less is more Even if it means you can't address every comment or point. The ones you do address will be easier to continue a dialogue over.

You are one of those posters who gets responses from a lot of people at once though. I've been there before - especially if you have an opinion that goes against the grain. But sometimes it's just not possible to respond to everyone either. (Or, maybe for you it is - you seem pretty good at grabbing all the comments lol).
True.

So, will you take me up on posting about 2-3 of Zepla's points you found interesting so we could discuss those?

Again, attack my post length all you want - I'm the only person actually talking about Zepla's arguments. How should we, as a forum, interpret the fact that there is only one person in this thread actually talking about the topic of the thread, and everyone else refuses to engage with said person on said topic, regardless of length?