
Originally Posted by
Heroman3003
Again, I talk about the perception I, and many others possibly, have of this purely based on the impression given by this thread's overall tone. Frankly, I do not believe story is above criticisms, but way too often do I see criticisms of "Endwalker ruined it" that actually make no sense, either due to being exactly same 'pitfalls' as storytelling of previous expansions, or because the poster actively ignores things to make their argument work. I don't think the story is perfect, and there were several moments I wished it'd focus on different things that I believe would have improved on it a lot. I don't think it's bad in the end, and enjoyed it regardless, but I've seen way too much completely bad faith trolling in regards to the EW story quality to take any criticisms made under flag of ragebait-named thread as genuine, especially considering, despite some actually interesting discussion I've seen in this thread, it's all bogged down and watered out with a lot of simple troll and anti-troll posts on both ends, to the point where it can be hard to tell the difference between those genuinely voicing their thought out opinions or just trying to get a reacton with "EW worst story ever because Alisae didn't die" level criticisms. That's why I called it a circlejerk ultimately - because with how watered down any criticism is with trolling that occurs in same direction, it's hard to tell the difference between legit and non-legit, and whole thread gives impression of just 'not legit' on first sight.