Queues for ranked are already long enough as it is, stop trying to kill the PVP of this game, and casual is fine as it is as well, it's fair the way it is, and if they add a "premade vs premade" system, it would never pop, so no its not viable.
Queues for ranked are already long enough as it is, stop trying to kill the PVP of this game, and casual is fine as it is as well, it's fair the way it is, and if they add a "premade vs premade" system, it would never pop, so no its not viable.
I'm well aware we're talking about premades in normal queue. Also, why do you think it'd be premade vs premade? You even stated earlier in multiple posts that they would be up against solo players, and suggested that if the solo players didn't like it that they could make their own groups.You know we talked there about premade groups in the normal queue right? If it is a premade group vs a premade group then nobody should get steamrolled more than in the random games cause both sides have the same advantages. And ofc it should be rewarded if you play well, if that means slightly faster ranking up then i don't see the problem and it is certainly not steamrolling others.
Now, if you want to make your own premade queue, then go right ahead. Oh, but no benefits for premades such as getting series exp faster. You get it at the same rate as the rest of us.
I'll keep it simple and leave it at that because I get the feeling that this isn't just a misunderstanding but an attempt on your part to be disingenuous.
It wouldn't affect solo queue times much i imagine, i'm sure there's plenty of players who would take longer queues to play with their friends.
Also, being able to play with your friends may encourage more people to PVP increasing participation


More people would queue for PvP in general if the developers cared enough about the mode to make simple QoL changes, and queues wouldn't be as long. But apparently we still can't get them to understand what "Player versus Player" means, as proven with the absolutely idiotic changes to Shatter, and completely uncalled for class adjustments that happen every patch.
PvE developers should not be implementing changes to PvP. PvP requires thorough playtesting before adjusting jobs, or changing maps significantly - Something they clearly don't do. Perhaps its just another show of arrogance like 1.0 where they believe they can do no wrong.



I don't really see the problem with allowing premade groups, especially when they're added in as a separate mode. As it stands, they already manage to do this with queue manipulation, or however they call it, so all adding a different queue would do is create a different barrier of entry. As for steamrolling, well, I think things would get interesting when Group A and Group B, both notorious for being undefeatable, suddenly meet up to clash.
Ranked is fine the way it is, but casual needs to allow small groups of 2 or 3.
And it's not even progressing faster if you think about it. I believe ranks 21-25 in the series require 7.7K series points. You get 700 for a loss, 900 for a win. Meaning if you lose all matches, that's only 11 matches. If you win all matches, that's only 9 matches. Winning and losing accounts for pretty much minimal changes in how long it takes to get a rank up. So queues for friends is a "No" from me, because winning matches barely effects your series rank.I am a fan of more effort, more rewards, but that's already in the game. You already progress faster if you win more. You just can't rig the games in your favor by trying to run with a full premade and telling other players to suck it up and team up themselves if they don't like it.


What? Where?I'm well aware we're talking about premades in normal queue. Also, why do you think it'd be premade vs premade? You even stated earlier in multiple posts that they would be up against solo players, and suggested that if the solo players didn't like it that they could make their own groups.
Now, if you want to make your own premade queue, then go right ahead. Oh, but no benefits for premades such as getting series exp faster. You get it at the same rate as the rest of us.
I'll keep it simple and leave it at that because I get the feeling that this isn't just a misunderstanding but an attempt on your part to be disingenuous.
Literally we are JUST TALKING HERE ABOUT PREMADE VS PREMADE. There is nothing else up for debate. I am 100% against premade vs. solo, that would suck and ruin the fun for so many people. Maybe you got confused somewhere along the way.
So if you would be so kind please explain to me how you got the impression from all of that that i would somehow have the opinion that SE should just throw premade groups into solo queues. That's just kuponuts.
Your argument was "Wouldn't they have to gut all the rewards for it? Pre-mades would stomp and get twice the progress, meanwhile solo players cannot communicate at all with each other." to which i said, believing we still talked about you know THE TOPIC OF THE THREAD WHICH IS PREMADE GROUPS VS PREMADE GROUPS IN A SEPERATE QUEUE that you meant that obviously good groups would rank up faster. Cause you know, they win matches faster and more often than solo players. To which i replied, yeah if that bothers solo players they can make a group and join the PREMADE QUEUE then. How by the twelve do you turn all of that into me being for groups slaughtering solo players?
Last edited by Ranaku; 06-05-2023 at 11:23 AM.
At least allow it for casual matches first.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



