Over on the first page, I added some additional questions to my initial post, but I want to reiterate those questions here for anyone skipping ahead to this more recent page.

In the future, I plan on doing more feedback threads later when we get new job change information during the next media tour and again after 7.0 launches to see how people feel about the listed changes before release and compare that to after we get to try those changes out. Even though that's still a ways away, I'd like to gather some more info on what I can do better with my formatting next time around. With that in mind, I have a few extra questions I'd like to get some feedback on:

Do you think the 1 to 10 scale I used for the content satisfaction questions was good, or would it be better to run with a 1 to 5 scale? Do you think I asked the right amount of questions, or the right questions in general? Are there other questions I should think about next time around? For the "What do you want to see more/less of" sections, I already feel like I can do a much better job adding more specific options to gain more clear information, as the "other" option ended up making the responses fairly unhelpful and hard to turn those questions into graph questions. Do you agree with this? What are other "more of/less of" answers do you think I should add for each job or specific jobs?

In regards to the 1 to 10 questions and overall satisfaction question, I want to follow up with a bit more detail. Now, I do realize that the answers we've gotten on these feedback submissions is limited in some respects, so the scores we have currently on these spreadsheets should be taken with a grain of salt. That said, I'd like to know, what do you think is a "good" score out of 10? And what exactly does that mean to you? At what point do you think a score indicates some amount of investigation into changes? Is a 7 out of 10 acceptable? Is a 5 out of 10 acceptable? If you feel a 1 to 5 scale is better, how would you translate those responses to a 1 to 5 scale?