
Originally Posted by
KatiaRelanah
No, there's a specific person in this thread (from yesterday at least) who declared ALL plugins are cheats. Period. For that matter, there's the person just above who cites that the fact that texmods are banned in their speedrunning community because some texmods exist that can be used to cheat exist, means that ALL texmods are cheats. My analogy remains, but to repeat it shorthand: the fact that something has the potential to be used for harm does not inherently mean that thing is harmful. *Edit: or to be more accurate, does not inherently mean that thing exists to cause harm. Anything can be harmful in sufficient quantities/improperly used etc.*
All I want is someone to say "you're right, some plugins are not cheats". And I'll say "and I agree with you that ALL plugins are against ToS, but I am glad you acknowledge that the word "cheat" is significant here".
I'm supposed to concede and give ground while they declare themselves victors. Nope. Not all plugins are cheats, simple as.
Edited edit: and in accordance with below, if Reshade is to what you refer: nope, that's not a "cheat" either.
Saying "it's too broad" is a bit of an understatement. Even with shader suites, whether it be GeForce's or Reshade's or whatever, there's a marked difference between people who crank up the vibrance because they want their screen to look like a bag of Skittles, and people who use fog or tint removal.
And even then, it becomes ever-more-granular. Is removing a fog actually helping a person functionally at all? Is it showing them things that change their decision making process or something? Or is it just making them enjoy the experience more? We have to cross thoroughly into mind-reader territory at that point.
And and by then, you might as well make the ridiculous argument that "the fact you enjoy the visual presentation more is cheating because you're in a better state of mind!" or something equally asinine.