You need to reread the thread - it was the the pro crowd that brought up mods, not the anti.
...huh?That said also saying no one is vocal about it is also a dumb metric
Are you just trying to devalue everything so any metrics are meaningless? Or are you trying to create a level playing field, where even though there's nothing that can back up the pro side, there's also nothing that can back up the anti side?
I'm genuinely curious what your aim is here.
Yes... and the talk about unlocking gender based sit poses is nonexistent.if we are being generous how many people do you think use the forums or social media that player FFXIV, I am willing to grant it is lager number then those that use mods.
...no, you absolutely can. How do you think sample sizes work? What % of people do you think need to offer an opinion before you can make an educated guess?Either way neither side can say if a feature is highly demanded or not.
No.So creating an argument that form PoV is pure speculation.
No. Why are you giving a lecture on speculation and whatnot and then making a statement on speculation as if it matters AT ALL? You're the one decided that it has no value, so why are you saying valueless things?I still stand by most probably would be in favor of shared sitting positions
If you mean "turn down", alot, based on what data is available.how many people would true down more options?
They're not.Pretty sure the numbskulls like myself that would turn down more options are "uniqueness" are in the monitory
They're the same thing. They're a business. If there's not any support of the request, they're not going to grant the request.Once again, the requirements for making a request differ from the requirements to get it granted.
Non-point - it can be said for anything. At that point, you're just making noise.Clearly there is a want for it or it would not have been requested


Reply With Quote


