We really should be able to glamour other jobs' sets

[Siddiax]

Correct. It doesn't change what they were designed around, but it doesn't mean they can't get creative once in a while. A blunt instrument wielded in the same fashion can still inflict damage. It's just going to be different.

You asked for a hammer example and I gave you a reasonably close response. The blunt pole is in there for DRG. I have no reason to make this up. I have little incentive to look it up, as you seem intent on dancing and dodging to try and not look foolish. I came here for proof of an axe that looks exactly like said hammer.

Spears and Blunt staves aren't used the same way. Even if they're a similar shape

They can also be creative as much as they want, just weird that they pretend to be super consistent. I've also never said there's an axe that looks like a hammer.

It's not a stretch at all. The stretch is trying to call this new hammer an axe.

I've never called the hammer an axe.

Because it doesn't slash, it doesn't fit? Interesting logic. Like I said, it fits the animation, they're just bonking things and it's a bit more realistic to wield that over a scythe.

It's funny that you're unable to cope with the fact that you're wrong, but my logic is correct

[Raikai]

I've never called the hammer an axe.

I did.

I suppose they took my joke seriously, but either it being whatever weapon, that's not important. That person missed the point of the earlier post, which is to contest the coherence of YP's statement about weapon X's appearance not ever being able to be used by job Y because it would look ridiculous or misplaced.

Yet we have now an example of how that statement doesn't hold. It doesn't matter if it is a hammer, an axe, a spear or the kitchen's sink.

[Deveryn]

I did.

I suppose they took my joke seriously, but either it being whatever weapon, that's not important. That person missed the point of the earlier post, which is to contest the coherence of YP's statement about weapon X's appearance not ever being able to be used by job Y because it would look ridiculous or misplaced.

Yet we have now an example of how that statement doesn't hold. It doesn't matter if it is a hammer, an axe, a spear or the kitchen's sink.

No. I knew you were full of it. Always have been. Always will be.

Starting to wonder if the devs have somehow been unaware this entire time that the Replica Sky Pirate/Rat sets are All Classes? Considering their track record both before and after their implementation...?

They're no doubt aware and decided to stop adding extra items like that to the log.

[Siddiax]

Unsure how I missed this, but the Manalis sets from the newest dungeon are straight up mind-blowing.

The Scouting set is quite literally a reskin of the Diabolic Fending set. Apparently Ninjas get to wear tank gear these days:

The actual Fending set is ironically less armored than the Scouting set:

As I've said before, whenever they re-use older gear, there seems to be no pattern or logic behind the role swaps. The "muh immersion" argument goes out the window yet again.