Portraits were better in Beta. Your design is ridiculous.

[Atelier-Bagur]

I just wish we had a lock feature of sorts. Where we can lock any portrait to retain its appearance even when you switch glams or sets or such

[VentVanitas]

I just wish we had a lock feature of sorts. Where we can lock any portrait to retain its appearance even when you switch glams or sets or such

The funny thing is that the portraits we use for adventurer plates already function similarly to that, they keep the glamour and even hair the same as when it was made- yet for whatever reason the other portraits don't function this way. Very odd.

[Rokke]

The funny thing is that the portraits we use for adventurer plates already function similarly to that, they keep the glamour and even hair the same as when it was made- yet for whatever reason the other portraits don't function this way. Very odd.

This is the mystifying part. I set my adventure plate a while back and it still looks exactly how I set it. I would much rather have 1 single picture that works than the option to have a ton of nonfunctional pictures attached to every gearset.


My FC mate was playing IT support last night trying to help people set theirs up. Its so needlessly complicated for what should be the equivalent of a signature.

[Gemina]

The funny thing is that the portraits we use for adventurer plates already function similarly to that, they keep the glamour and even hair the same as when it was made- yet for whatever reason the other portraits don't function this way. Very odd.

Oddly enough, it's the adventurer plate that should update depending on what you're currently rolling as. And the coding is already there tied to the gearsets we save for each job/class.

Man what mess this is. I often say the devs shouldn't be wasting time and resources needlessly, so something like this drives me totally batty.