Is SE planning to deal with ilvl cheese people?

[Kaurhz]

If they didn't want iLv cheese to be as prolific as it is then perhaps they would have the common courtesy of rebalancing the older alliance raids in accordance to be consistent across the board.

Similarly, maybe they shouldn't tie so much of the relic to a particular alliance raid then people wouldn't feel further inclined to cheese it.

To put it into perspective... Why on earth would people draw from the whole set of alliance raids, when they can not only progress ShB relics, but also get the exp gain from it being a roulette?

Why would people feel inclined to draw from a whole set of alliance raids, when the disparity of time taken on ARR/HW alliance raids is around 14 minutes versus the typical 25-30 minutes on the average group for SB raids?

As far as I am concerned; they don't need to do anything regarding this stunt, they need to resolve it at the source of the problem, which stems from the balance between all the alliance raids, and similarly their elected decision making to have the ShB relics so deeply rooted in the ARR alliance raids.

[ASkellington]

As far as I am concerned; they don't need to do anything regarding this stunt, they need to resolve it at the source of the problem, which stems from the balance between all the alliance raids, and similarly their elected decision making to have the ShB relics so deeply rooted in the ARR alliance raids.

This. This was a dumb decision on their part from the get go. CT raids shouldn't be apart of any relic save its own (ARR) and maybe HW.

[Midareyukki]

Similarly, maybe they shouldn't tie so much of the relic to a particular alliance raid then people wouldn't feel further inclined to cheese it.

At that point it won't just be the CT raids, but the Ivalice raids too. CT's just easier to cheese because ilv caught up with it long ago, Ivalice is still kicking some.