Results 1 to 10 of 56

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Layte_Aeon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    69
    Character
    Layte Aeon
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 91
    Quote Originally Posted by Ralphe2449 View Post
    It was a bit silly in endwalker when Elidibus says ‘you cannot change the events of the past to save the future’ while this is literally what Graha did with the crystal tower, having both timelines and loop at the same time is a bit problematic
    It literally isn't. What G'raha did with the tower changed nothing about the future he came from, he can't go back to it and he's no longer sure it even exists. We the players know it exists and we know that sending the crystal tower back changed nothing.
    (8)

  2. #2
    Player

    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    172
    Quote Originally Posted by Layte_Aeon View Post
    It literally isn't. What G'raha did with the tower changed nothing about the future he came from, he can't go back to it and he's no longer sure it even exists. We the players know it exists and we know that sending the crystal tower back changed nothing.
    The moment you include the timeline as an actual thing, you can no longer be certain if it is a loop or just a new timeline, nobody can guarantee we arent now on a new timeline and the one where we left still exists but with the WoL disappearing forever, not only that but with timelines being a thing the possibilities are literally infinite as to what can happen and how many exist.

    By that logic as well we can have invaders from other timelines since in a sense, Graha came from a different timeline, what stops other timelines from doing the same considering there's infinite possibilities and Graha wont be the only person to achieve time travel in said infinite timelines.

    Like that is the problem when you decide to go both ways, I guess it can be interesting since you can have a garlemald victory timeline and finally give us a decent garlemand empire but it doesnt change the fact it is quite a bit silly when you open that can of worms and makes the story have less weight since anything can just be explained as a new timeline when you time travel like this.
    (1)
    The tryhard elitist is the person who is going to finish their 5 pieces on this created to be beaten """"challenge"""" and then complaint that the baby, slower or less dexterous person are a problem which not only is toxic but indirectly implies that doing this basic created to be beaten task faster is an """achievement""" of """great skill""" which helps to falsely boost the elitist's self worth as that is their true motive, if challenge was truly their desire they would relish in the chance to do more than the rest.
    The healthy person on the other hand will either let people finish their part or assist them for their self worth does not depend on solving basic puzzles created to be beaten, aka as a video game.