Oh look, you're putting words in my mouth. I never called for a SMN nerf, I merely said it would be at the bottom with proper balance. Go harass someone else, trollThat's just mean we'd really have a melee/ranged/caster/flex. Honestly, it'd work but it's not gonna happen.
I read you fine. You said that it should be 5% between worst and best. Also, you said Summoner (currently on the bottom 7% behind Monk on P6S) deserves a nerf. I read you perfectly fine that you have no coherence and you make no sense.
Your opinion is not required anymore.
I'm pretty sure I could find many posts where you were wrong. To simply put, you're a RDM purist that only care about RDM.
Ah yeah, this.
Remember this reply? There's a reason it has 15 likes. You did mention that, I read it properly but your take was still really bad.
You're making really bad jokes when you say that and it's no wonder people don't take you seriously.
But I will add facts into this conversation with actual evidences that y'all need to understand complexity involves the fight directly. Back in Stormblood, I was a Melee DPS. When I would get downtime.
Here is a video of a week 1 clear of a DRG PoV. I've put the timestamp to point my point. https://youtu.be/jISBDvFG3S4?t=73 Look at how tiny the hitbox is and look. Hello World is basically High Concept. Notice how the fight is still going and you still have to DPS? Notice how this Dragoon is forced to take the L and disengage and use his backflip to get back into the fight faster? He's still second DPS and that's taking into account the BRD is doing 5% more due to Piercing Debuff from the Dragoon. During that time, the tax to help Melee was valid.
How about we check this tier's last boss as a melee DPS? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9_t7md58v0
- No downtime (100% melee uptime)
- No positional Cry me a freaking river Melee DPS
- Every single mechanic in the fight including Natural Alignment happens in the enormous hitbox of the box so Melee can DPS.
- High Concept which WOULD induce melee downtime by the nature of mechanics has the boss conveniently invulnerable.
High Concept is the equivalent of Hello World. Why is the boss invulnerable now? Because it would suck for melee DPS. So SE designed the fight for you to not DPS on it. This is not only unfair to ranged and caster DPS who are getting taxed for no reason anymore. This is ridiculously unfair to healers who still have to plan mitigations and I can tell you a good amount of my groups wipes were healers figuring out. I had nothing to do. I guess I had to think about Radiant Aegisepelaugh:
So let's redefine DPS in this fight.
Caster DPS: A DPS that has to plan their movement during uptime and mechanics. Summoners gets the excuse they are basically a physical ranged DPS with 4 casts per minute.
Ranged DPS: A DPS that has infinite mobility.
Melee DPS: A DPS that has infinite mobility with a 10% damage buff over Ranged and Caster.
And y'all talking how SMN and MCH should do trash damage because they are brain dead? Look at this Ninja. This was a target dummy fight for him. I don't really care if you're saying they press a lot more buttons than other jobs. So does Machinist? There is no more complexity in fights for melee DPS. There is no more difficulty. Melee DPS is just a ranged physical DPS that doesn't go on the backrow.
I'll go even further and beyond. https://xivanalysis.com/fflogs/VmgJQXdBHFbNPWcK/7 This is their week 1 clear xivanalysis. They have purposefully delayed their last buff window for the Summoner who dropped Phoenix before Ego Death and when they got the buff, the SMN went and quickened his primal summons to get Bahamut ASAP in the buff window:
They got the clear with 1 death. By doing that, the SMN got a final Phoenix which was a free 1300 potency oGCD. The result of them making this choice was definitely not "brain dead". They gave it a lot of thoughts and SMN truly shine on those 1/2 minutes buff windows. This shows one thing. It doesn't matter how smooth and easy a rotation is on a target dummy. What defines a big part of the complexity of a rotation is the fight design. The fight designs have been making it so friendly to melee DPS that it makes it really easy for them. People would like to make you think that MCH and SMN are brain dead. "Look at their stupid silly rotation! Mine is harder!" They definitely will omit to say that thanks to this optimization, that group cleared week 1 P8S with a death.
So, yeah, I firmly believe all casters and ranged DPS need to be uplifted to melee DPS with a 2% to 3% difference. If you feel this is wrong, you are one of the following;
- You don't raid seriously and you have no idea what you're talking about but you have the right to post your opinion here.
- You secretly hate the jobs you want to see at the bottom. This is especially true to a few Red Mage mains that are tired to always be behind SMN and they have a new bullet called "SMN is easy compared to RDM"
- You are biased toward a role. Many Melee DPS wants to remain the DPS King role.
- You have no knowledge of the actual job you are criticizing
- You are a one trick player
Take Firemage for example. He only plays RDM. He doesn't play SMN & BLM and yet he gives himself the right to say SMN/MCH is doing no damage. He has no knowledge of those jobs, he didn't even know you could work around the rotation that this week 1 group I posted did. He's very biased to be playing RDM only. I'm sorry dude, I can't take you seriously. You don't have enough experience to make such claim and while you're free to post your opinions, SE may look at them and that's dangerous. If you're looking for RDM to deal more DPS, then you should target more specific reasons why RDM is doing lower damage: raise.
Literally not possible, troll. You won't find a single post where I said that SMN should be nerfed. Saying it should be at the bottom is not calling for a nerf. I've literally said multiple times that proper balance would increase the damage of MOST of the DPS, and nerf and most a melee or two. But hey, when has the truth every stopped trolls from harassing others?
Literally not possible, troll. You won't find a single post where I said that SMN should be nerfed. Saying it should be at the bottom is not calling for a nerf. I've literally said multiple times that proper balance would increase the damage of MOST of the DPS, and nerf and most a melee or two. But hey, when has the truth every stopped trolls from harassing others?
There is literally no reason to touch any melee whose name isn't RPR. If anything, the rest of melee are well balanced enough that they should be the baseline for balancing and should not be touched.
Starting to easy tax melee would be the only thing more cringe than not doing anything about the ranged tax.
Wrong, MNK and NIN are a smidge too high, hitting each GCD combo hit by like 10 potency would smooth them out. Like BLM should be where MNK is now, and then MNK and NIN where DRG and SAM are, and then the rest all brought up to where they should beThere is literally no reason to touch any melee whose name isn't RPR. If anything, the rest of melee are well balanced enough that they should be the baseline for balancing and should not be touched.
Starting to easy tax melee would be the only thing more cringe than not doing anything about the ranged tax.
This fluctuates per fight. The only who seems consistently lower end is DRG and its not by a lot.
That's fine and all, but the biggest issue that is where the "rest" should be. Because I would argue at least where RPR currently stands (which isn't even good, mind you) should be that baseline with RPR being moved up.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote





