Great summary about what is so laughably cringeworthy about interactions on Twitter and this presumption that the man is "mentally ill" coupled with accusations of "ableism" when you point out he's still not justified, as a result, in wiping his people out (if we wanted to play such a game, imagine how much more trenchantly you could justify some of our major villains thanks to the characteristics of some sundered societies), just because he read their every kind act as some perceived slight. And yes, I've seen the peer review comment come up a bit, and it's baffling to me. If anything, he did everything he could to evade submitting her through their usual processes. I think the main reason it wasn't picked up on as dangerous is that dynamis was an obscure area of knowledge with so few limited practical applications in their own world, that his fellow researchers probably saw it as a harmless curiosity.