Didn't think actions that were morally incorrect but existentially necessary (lit. necessary evils) were that controversial an idea. If we can't agree such things exist, there's no point in continuing to discuss this.

... which, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is what people are saying, not trying to shut down criticism. It's just that we've gone down that road to the end of the line time and again already; no point in doing so once more. Also, it's been seven months.