let me tell u guys “Win-trading”

[Nanne]

We had the exact same situation in Light and the rank 1 player who constantly played only against same 1-3 people on the same job that threw against them. It took 4 weeks of reporting to get them removed from the leaderboards

[Nanne]

Also use the Special Task Force report option from Square's own site to report it and provide all the details. People have been retroactively removed from leaderboards before and SE has sent rewards to the rightful owners after it too so not all hope is lost

[MarsyCurXi]

Your suppossed win trader has kills and assists?

I know what you're describing. They do. They don't care about time. They care about results. If you were in a match, which is unlikely, you would see all the normal players do, except for one thing, which is that the "player" would win all the time, then lose a game or two on a regular basis to avoid arousing suspicion.

Speaking of which, why do I doubt it?



First of all, like I said at the beginning, they never play during normal hours, have a fixed win rate, and never lose points when leaderboards are updated.

Second, start the game at a ETtime. It's basically integer time.

And how they show off their "skills" without reservation on VCAPP.

[Petite]

These people gross me out.

I can only imagine the problem getting worse once SE adds gear/mounts to the top 100.

GMs should be given more autonomy by SE to better deal with wintrading cases. Having heard from ex-GM posts from multiple MMOs before, I know the scope of what they can do is incredibly limited.

[MaidyPusheen]

really?

[Chelsee]

lmao (message must be at least 10 characters)

[BRVV]

Just read the first thread again. This is wintrading not RMT (real money trading), right?

[Katoar]

Win trading is usually incentivized by RMT. But I don't think win-trading is as bad as OP says, at least in my DC. Rank 2, last time I checked, had around 1100 victories. You can assume they had around 800-900 defeats or something like that. That's a lot of time spent. If someone is win-trading their number of games played tends to be lower as well, as they do not want to lose the points they spent money on. But then there is always the possibility that they got lucky or are very skilled players and therefore have a high win rate.

[Petite]

If someone is win-trading their number of games played tends to be lower as well

Yes. Thus the case above is clear cut to me when you look at their # of victories. They probably lost 635 in a day trying to play by themselves or to attempt to make it less obvious.

Add the points they lost and they're at 9417 which is probably as high as they chose to go with RMT.

[BRVV]

My point is: since you don't know if they exchange money would RMT really be the correct report?