For instance, in French :
"Our methods wouldn't have brought a human here". I seem to recall the english version is not so far from that quote though.Originally Posted by Emet-Selch
Where is that 100% coming from, exactly? If anything, Endwalker means to communicate that the risk of extinction is 100%, since every species died in a way or another.
Hermes also makes the wish to find a way to manipulate Dynamis, as it would open incredible things. He does mention that he does not have such high ambitions.
The reason he created Meteion using Dynamis was so that she'd have a power source where there's no aether. It wasn't a way to experiment with another power, but a simple mean to an end: have the Meteion probes in the sky.
Now no, they can't maipulate Dynamis directly, but they can create beings able to manipulate it. We can't manipulate electricity directly, or nuclear fission, it hasn't stopped us from building machines doing the job for us.Originally Posted by Hermes
So the solution to other people being exterminated or wiped out by cataclysm, is making your race weaker. Quick reminder that a few cataclysm already almost destroyed Etheirys. Life does find a way each time, true, but isn't it the same for Dragons and Omicrons? Midgardsormr chose to flee and rebuilt his race on another planet. Omega doesn't seem like it's going to die either. Even the recreations of the Omicrons managed to find a new meaning.
What's to say people of the plenty didn't have an Hermes who valued life too much to actually want Ra'la to kill them?
Question is, did they move to prevent the third sacrifice, or because she knew that it had to be then and there according to what we told her? Just like she decided not to sunder the three Ancients because we told her they weren't.
She seems to imply she's going to stick to the plan when we go back to the present.
If she even wishes us to be with her until the end, the plan of Sundering everything is already almost decided in her mind.Originally Posted by Venat
While a single Amaurotine may birth multiple horrors, they're all able to wield magic to fend for themselves (not the creation kind). They also don't lose their people when it happens, and it doesn't spread the same way. The situation when the Satrap dies is a perfect example, one person succombed to despair and it spread like wildfire.
Frankly I think both are equally awful situations and one isn't better than the other. It's a choice between summoning more assailants against losing people who might be helpful in reolving the crisis.


Reply With Quote


