State of the Game prior to Liveletter

[KizuyaKatogami]

The quality of said content is a subjective matter entirely, of which there is no discussion wherein a mutual agreement can be reached. E.g., some people will prefer Bozja, and some will prefer Eureka. Conversely, there are those that think Endwalker is a better story than Shadowbringers. Similarly, there are those that think the Heavensward story is a steaming pile of garbage. So let's not actually try and be under the impression that quality is an objective matter here.

Furthermore, the issue on the quantity of said content isn't really that simple of a matter, barring that which involves the extreme primal weapons. Whilst you could arguably make the claim we have fewer glamours, the research done into this thus far is inadequate at best. Whilst it does indeed account for it across dungeons, it does not however accommodate for those that are actually unique. Case in point with Gubal Library. Whilst it does indeed have a unique set, this is only one across several roles, and is similar across quite a few dungeons in Heavensward wherein the alterations made to certain sets of gear are minimalistic at best. E.g., Sohm Al. Another point on the case of glamours. The large-scale 24-man raids prior to ShB were not actually dyable and was only first present in ShB, continuing in EW with the Panthean sets, to my knowledge, and in fact only came about to be dyable when they decided to reuse these assets later on in i320, and i450

Additionally, whilst you can lay the claim that Eureka has more zones than Bozja this completely fails to take into account the very fact that within Bozja are included several 24-man raids which arguable arguably take considerable development time in itself, and then there is the larger scale savage content which need I might add was a very highly requested feature. So contrary to your belief this issue is not as simple as: Eureka has more zones, therefore has more content. Conversely less zones does not automatically equivocate less content, especially in the context of Eureka and Bozja.

Not that I entirely disagree on some points, but there are some absolutely wild takes, especially with the comparison between Bozja and Eureka.

Quality can be objective under some circumstances, unless you think they truly put in 100% quality when it came to hrothgar hairstyles.... or healer changes. Or the amount of time it took for them to fix drk living dead etc.

[Kaurhz]

Quality can be objective under some circumstances, unless you think they truly put in 100% quality when it came to hrothgar hairstyles.... or healer changes. Or the amount of time it took for them to fix drk living dead etc.

Sure we can make the claim that under certain circumstances quality of content can be seen as being objective, particular when some cutting methods are required, especially in the case of Hrothgar, that I am inclined to agree. However, the universal use of quality content leads me to believe that your intent is you believe it to be entirely objective. There are more components of this game that fall within the realm of subjectivity than there are not.

Snip.

Dunno, but look on the bright-side, we apparently have a forum psychologist now. Congratulations.

[Breakbeat]

Dunno, but look on the bright-side, we apparently have a forum psychologist now. Congratulations.

Passing observations about the current state of the Earth doesn't really make one a psychologist. I just think I pay attention where many, many others don't even stop to think.

[anhaato]

Passing observations about the current state of the Earth doesn't really make one a psychologist. I just think I pay attention where many, many others don't even stop to think.

That’s why you’re posting on some random game forum instead of getting book deals