1 House 1 FC per DC Only

[Themarvin]

In short you don't have a clue what that means. The Director and dev team do however.

Fairplay to all to be on common ground, the Director should take a stance against grandfathering, and get over it, there is no way you can justify 3-4-5-6-30 houses on one paid account, and is not fairplay to all other who may only get within limitations now and too come.

It may sound silly in your ears, and not fair, if you fall outside the suggestion range, but not in those 1000s of players who is looking for a roof over their head other than an apartment or FC room it does not.

[Shibi]

there is no way you can justify 3-4-5-6-30 houses on one paid account

1000s of players who is looking for a roof over their head other than an apartment or FC room

Will punishing people for playing inside the rules really do much when there are "1000s of players...looking for a roof"?

Better to push SE to deal with the real problem, rather than just bandaiding over the real problem more hoping to hide it from view for another 18 days (2 cycles).

[Ayan_Calvesse]

Fairplay to all to be on common ground, the Director should take a stance against grandfathering, and get over it, there is no way you can justify 3-4-5-6-30 houses on one paid account, and is not fairplay to all other who may only get within limitations now and too come.

It may sound silly in your ears, and not fair, if you fall outside the suggestion range, but not in those 1000s of players who is looking for a roof over their head other than an apartment or FC room it does not.

What if I run 8 FC's with players in them other then myself?

[PredatoryCatgirl]

What if I run 8 FC's with players in them other then myself?

I will buy you a patch of grass just so you can touch it.

[LaylaTsarra]

Fairplay to all to be on common ground, the Director should take a stance against grandfathering

He already has. Get a clue. It's not going to happen. I'll tell you what you can continue to post your personal view of trying to hurt those who did nothing but follow the rules but I suggest you come back when you see it in the patch notes. Don't hold your breath.

In the meantime those of us who love housing will continue to follow the rules as they are announced. I'm confident that any new rules will never be retroactively applied.

+ I would like to see more "wards" added in the other zones...like the Ruby sea or Mhor Drona or Iddlyshire; basically any of the non-capital zones should have 1-2 wards; this would expand the ward idea of a

I suspect we'll see new housing districts as time goes by but until then I seriously hope there are plans for some major ward additions with the receipt of new servers. I was particularly surprised to only see Ishgard announced with 24 wards with no new ones in any of the previous districts. I would have thought the wards would have been expanded to 30 but I'm of the view that did not happen because of the lack of new server resources due to the pandemic.

Adding wards and districts will not solve the problem however in my view unless something is done with instanced housing the easiest of which would be to drastically improve apartments to include small, medium and large with different layouts. Airships and subs need to go to GC and a means to make gardening available for all would help with the demand for ward housing given many want a FC house or personal house simply to get access to that content.

One has to hope that with the advent of real numbers due to the lottery submissions the Director and those with control of the purse strings will actually start to address the issue of meeting demand.

[UkcsAlias]

He already has. Get a clue. It's not going to happen. I'll tell you what you can continue to post your personal view of trying to hurt those who did nothing but follow the rules but I suggest you come back when you see it in the patch notes. Don't hold your breath.

In the meantime those of us who love housing will continue to follow the rules as they are announced. I'm confident that any new rules will never be retroactively applied.

This discussion happened to often, and whatever devs say. History says diffirent. And history repeats itself. Devs never are capable of infinitely keeping promises.

Devs can change rules. Something previously allowed can be made invalid. And as long as 99.9% of the population in a game is unaffected, the 0.1% that is affected will be forced to live with it.

[Divinemights]

This discussion happened to often, and whatever devs say. History says diffirent. And history repeats itself. Devs never are capable of infinitely keeping promises.

Devs can change rules. Something previously allowed can be made invalid. And as long as 99.9% of the population in a game is unaffected, the 0.1% that is affected will be forced to live with it.

Certainly, no one can stop you from dreaming