With sources please explain what the conditions in Zodiark are to justify human sacrifice. I see a collection of despondent souls desperately repeating their devotion to the god they became. And if that experience is so horrible then maybe they should sealed Zodiark away and put the souls into a state of sleep and not, yknow, use them as their own personal god? Maybe not subject new souls that to “torture?” I think we can find a middle ground between “fate worse than death” and “not great.”
If that cure required grinding living breathing human beings into paste I’d say that’s not ok.
Great! Wonder why they felt they needed to do that then!
Cool we’ve established they could break down other sources.
Ok so now we’re establishing that any living energy is an acceptable alternative. In which case, why did the Ascians work towards sacrificing the denizens of the Source, given the wealth of living beings that aren’t sentient?
Oh so now we’re saying that Ancient souls are special. So you agree that Ancient souls are special, and thus are a better option than other living alternatives. In which case we suddenly have another reason to believe the Ancients were not sacrificing chickens right?
You’re justifying human sacrifice by saying they were stressed out.
This is the exact quote in English.
Notice this is a bit more nuanced that your quote. They opposed his creation, yet never wished to unmake him. If what you say is true then this would be a lie. The alternative is this isn’t a lie, and Hydaelyns group rightfully recognized that once Zodiark was summoned no alternative form of protection was feasible and thus did not wish to unmake him. By itself, one could I think handwave this away as another gap purposefully left in his memory. That is if we didn’t have another who disagreed with Zodiarks summoning. A noted defector specifically.
The term has been co-opted, but I believe this is what they call “virtue signaling.”