Quote Originally Posted by redheadturk View Post
I believe there is moral value in making life comfortable for other human beings, and I feel it is immoral to bring suffering, pestilence, starvation, and war upon a species that had never suffered such before. So yes, I consider Venat's actions to be morally reprehensible.
I have to wonder where that ends then. The Ancients desire for comfort would ultimately lead them to destruction, so is oblivion better than pain? Is it ever acceptable to cause pain, or is the ultimate good simply to maximize comfort?

After all that’s ultimately the dilemma Venat faced.