Watching Gaming Kinda with Xenos about housing

[Stormpeaks]

So punish players for SE's inability to add more wards ?

[LianaThorne]

So punish players for SE's inability to add more wards ?

Grandfathered is an exception but anyone who abused the system via FCs should absolutely lose all but one.

[Stormpeaks]

Grandfathered is an exception but anyone who abused the system via FCs should absolutely lose all but one.

But if availability wasnt this bad this wouldnt be an issue

[LianaThorne]

But if availability wasnt this bad this wouldnt be an issue

How about we don't make excuses for people who abuse said already limited availability?

No one's saying that housing is perfect, it absolutely should go instanced. Until then, the issue still stands that people who abused it via the FC loophole should lose all but one.

[Alaray]

But if availability wasnt this bad this wouldnt be an issue

But, since availability is this bad it is an issue. You sort of defeated your own argument.

[Dyvid]

But if availability wasnt this bad this wouldnt be an issue

Should of, could of, would of.... It is what it is. Other than to flex there is not good reason for a player to own more than one house and any player that does, in my opinion, is just selfish.

I can't believe there wasn't already some kind of one 1 account, 1 house restriction lmao

There was. You could have one private house and one FC house. Players abused the FC part at the beginning, using alt characters to create new FC with the same FC initials so they could have FC wards.

[Stormpeaks]

Should of, could of, would of.... It is what it is. Other than to flex there is not good reason for a player to own more than one house and any player that does, in my opinion, is just selfish.

That is very wrong, but sure.

[Kaurhz]

So punish players for SE's inability to add more wards ?

Regardless of your own personal feelings, there is no excuse. The developers put restrictions in for a perfectly good reason, and it wasn't so that people could have a dozen service accounts to abuse the system.

[Stormpeaks]

Regardless of your own personal feelings, there is no excuse. The developers put restrictions in for a perfectly good reason, and it wasn't so that people could have a dozen service accounts to abuse the system.

How is that abuse ? A person making multiple accounts to have more than one houses in a single ward does not equal to abuse.

[Kaurhz]

How is that abuse ? A person making multiple accounts to have more than one houses in a single ward does not equal to abuse.

I can absolutely tell you it is abuse. They most certainly didn't incorporate the 30d member requirement for an FC, the minimum player count per FC, or the minimum number of FCs per service account just for the fun of it - They done this because people were abusing the system to attain more houses than the game intended.