help I can't swim through all of these semantics and I am drowning




help I can't swim through all of these semantics and I am drowning
Good idea putting 24 man instances and 4 man instances in the same roulette I'm sure new players trying to continue their msq will love their 12h queue.To be fair CT really should be part of the MSQ roulette. The reason why it pops so much in the alliance roulette is because;
1.) Its mandatory to progress the MSQ unlike the later raids so its already going to pop more often.
2.) Its easy to guarantee that one to pop because players remove all their gear for fast and easy exp.
Place CT into the MSQ roulette would fix both problems.
whats ur point here brother, ur not saying anything about why CT is bad, only why changing it to a 4 man is bad, which is still something within the developers power to address


The menacing aura of every Lalafell.



No, no it is mandatory now. Can't progress to HW til you do CT. I did this with a friend on alts.





The roulette fills whats needed with what is available...
ITs not going to increase queue times. Otherwise you would never get 8man ex fights, guildhests, 4 man dungeons, etc, in mentor roulette, because 24mans exist.
boy howdy i can tell u i get guildhests and ex fights frequently.


Why do i have the feeling the people saying CT should be part of MSQ roulette would be right back and complain about getting CT in MSQ roulette...
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote





