We really should be able to glamour other jobs' sets

[Flaws]

Ah, right, I thought about this, but I didn't say it. Accessories would be in a much better place, only having to get, for example, one black choker instead on five or six replicas for each type of job, which would be a win-win scenario both to players and the devs, particularly thinking about how we get to save space for more glamours without them having to expand the dresser.

Yes, this will hugely improve the glam dresser situation with items that are identical but for different jobs. Its crystal clear that they either struggle or are simply too lazy to come up with entirely different designs for each job in many cases when new content comes out so they might as well just simplify their job and give us unlimited glam potential at the same time. A win-win.

[DisAstranagant]

Now that you can glam things like the Archfiend set onto literally every job, I don't see any reason as to why gear should be restricted by job other than that they can't implement it for some technical reason. In which case I wish they would just straight up say so.

[Siddiax]

Now that you can glam things like the Archfiend set onto literally every job, I don't see any reason as to why gear should be restricted by job other than that they can't implement it for some technical reason. In which case I wish they would just straight up say so.

The Archfiend set is just the most recent example. There's still the fact that every piece of armor on the mogstation or event stuff like Noctis' set/Chicken outfit have no role restrictions. For whatever reason though, the actual fantasy gear that will more often than not fit other roles, has to follow glam restrictions.

[Corvus_V]

been dreaming of this for years, with no good reason as to why it shouldn't be the case, given all the frog suits and bikini tanks lol

[Darthgummibear]

If someone can go into battle dressed as a giant frog or elephant, there is absolutely zero reason for their to be glamour restrictions of any kind.

[Veinera]

Bumping this!

[Siddiax]

Furthemore, when they add new jobs in 7.0 they'll 100% use scouting/casting/etc. The chances of the new jobs having the same style as the older jobs will be slim to none (as was the case with GNB) which means they'll need more options when it comes to glamour.

[Tsiron]

We've already seen it happen with RDM (stuffy robes do not match all their athletics) and RPR (they're stated to be assassins, their 2 unique sets are both light armour and/or just cloth)

[ty_taurus]

I definitely want more attention on this topic. This is really something that we could've had years ago, and it's something that's been nagging at me more and more every day just how frustrated I am that I can't wear some of my favorite gear because I do not care to play as scouting or striking jobs.

[Siddiax]

We've already seen it happen with RDM (stuffy robes do not match all their athletics) and RPR (they're stated to be assassins, their 2 unique sets are both light armour and/or just cloth)

Oh yes, RDM and RPR are really good examples. Striking gear would definitely fit RPR more than Maiming currently does. Even Sage (sleek, no robes) goes for a different aesthetic than the rest of the healers.