What people expect from this housing blunder.

[Seera1024]

I expect them to fix the bug so that it doesn't happen again.

Any remedy for the problems the glitch caused shouldn't cause additional problems.

To me, this means that if a plot didn't get hit by the 0 or no participants bug and someone won, then that person gets to keep the lot. The losers did get their gil back so it's not like they are out of money for it.

To many technical issues to solve to redo the bids on the plots where someone won.

But yes, if there's a way to track the sole bidders and give them the lot, then that should be done.

[DixieBellOCE]

I expect them to fix the bug so that it doesn't happen again.

Any remedy for the problems the glitch caused shouldn't cause additional problems.

To me, this means that if a plot didn't get hit by the 0 or no participants bug and someone won, then that person gets to keep the lot. The losers did get their gil back so it's not like they are out of money for it.

To many technical issues to solve to redo the bids on the plots where someone won.

But yes, if there's a way to track the sole bidders and give them the lot, then that should be done.

It should be possible as all the bids are saved in a database on their end, it just means a lot of manual work for the team to sit down and manually allocate each house to each buyer.
Good way to punish the dev who overlooked the rand() command and forgot to remove 0 from the results XD