Quote Originally Posted by Kolsykol View Post
That's not how it works..............
Just the same here, just because Au Ra looks different in some concept art doesn't mean that they were always intended to look that way and the devs changed them due to alterior motives.
Personally I like them more in the more '' beastial '' concept art they look almost like a Succubus race to me or at least more demonic.
But I think what is going on is that people see concept art they like better and then they make these wild assumptions that it was how they were originally meant to look and that the devs changed them.
The art team don't just draw one iteration and then settle on it they draw a lot of them I am fairly sure that there's significantly more that they simply haven't released to the public.
It was just one other example of an idea they were playing around with it simple as that.
This is where my Mind is with Female Hrothgar.
We in fact have NO bearing at all in how they will look, but so far a couple of people think that little art snippet in the "artbook" or that "Mural" is proof of Final Concept.
It is not.
Ive asked this several times in the actual thread....if this is how they were intended to look, then why arnt they finished yet? They should have been finished before Male Viera if those 2 things are Solid Proof in how they will look.
ALSO, they said they have settled on 2 Concepts....so that means once again they will likely look very different then what little 'art' we have seen of them.

Im prepared for the possibility of being wrong, but until proven right or wrong, I dont thing the 2 pieces of art we saw are what they will look like.
It makes no logical sense considering Hrothgar are a Beast Race