A request for respectfulness rings a little hollow when the first non-quotation line of your post is basically a dig at the person you're replying to.'Which in turn, leads us to our next question: how did Hermes, in his role as Fandaniel, not recognize the subject of his own research? We must assume that he either knew and was unable to help, or that he was otherwise prevented from identifying the cause in the first place. At this juncture, all we can do is speculate.'
'To be clear, the Convocation does not tolerate acts of deception or malice. We are practiced at perceiving truth, and would have known had Fandaniel lied to us. Hermes has no conscious wish for the world to end. Of that, I am certain.' (MSQ: A Flower Upon Your Return)
I think the reason why this passage exists is pretty self-explanatory. They didn't deliberately leave it as a clue for you to write AU fanfics with.
It's wholly unsurprising that there are still elements of society out there who would be uncomfortable with the idea of a decisive, messianic female lead saving the world. That doesn't make this narrative decision at all controversial or groundbreaking. I would also respectfully ask if you would avoid using the term 'genocide' flippantly to spice up your argument if you aren't entirely confident in your understanding of its historical, cultural, and racial significance.
Last edited by Lurina; 01-13-2022 at 11:33 PM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.