Quote Originally Posted by darkstarpoet1 View Post
i have to disagree here. option 2 is more for people that wanted a merge with more people to play with in general and keep their servers in tact. i am much much happier with the option we are using now. at least this way you have a few ls's that wanted to leave their community getting stuck. the other way you would have had complete servers split into pieces.
Yeah, can be difference of opinions here because people are in different situations and etc. For example I am from Cornelia and we have like ~90 NA players at max, so it wouldn't be hard to coordinate them all in option 4 if they all desired to play together still.

I am sure some players don't want to play on the server they are on either, but I guess that's not enough for them to just choose Ragnarok? haha

Option 2 is def. better if inactives want to come back though, I won't deny that.

Either way I guess I am impartial, but I liked the amount of choice you receive with option 4. Such as coordinating people across servers to be on the same server; which is slightly more difficult on option 2 (unless Ragnarok, again lol). You would have also seen a lot more new people from different backgrounds. Its sort of like accents, midwestern, boston etc. On WoW I played on Garona, and when I made an alt on a different server to play with my friend they actually referred to different things with terms I was unfamiliar with. Stuff like that gets to be interesting