You could all transfer to Ragnarok, you know?

[Vydos]

You can also change more than once, up until the 12th. You could all move to ragnarok, so the other worlds open up, then move to the world you really want.

Sorry if I'm making too much sense this morning.

I was about to type the same idea but basically what Molly is saying is the most viable and good solution. Unfortunately we all know that we live in a world where cooperation is near non-existant. Especially when it comes to the internet.

[Phe]

You could all move to ragnarok, so the other worlds open up, then move to the world you really want.

Next challenge:
Get a triangle on Ragnarok.

[Lebannen]

I had initially intended to move to ragnarok but my LS doesnt seem to want to, besides few of the eu people on this forum have said that they will so chances for ragnarok being a good choice are slim. now if everyone moved that would be a different thing entirely, but what are the chances of that?

[Leigh]

Raganarok is so alt

[Yowyow]

i heavily considered it but ls doesnt want to... rather stupid too. if SE never marked ragnarok as EU server. that server would be flooded bigtime

[Halvaard_Vidan]

Ragnarok is so hipster...

[Awa]

Ragnarok is not a EU serveur >< it s for everyone.

1- Only ragnarok is open so all new player will come on this serveur in first.

2- then all other server r full but there r lot of inactive character, on ragnarok all players play often

Come on ragnarok we can change this world together ^^

[Vackashken]

There will be people there. I don't know why people are pushing for it. 11 French shells and 7 German shells confirmed thats where they are going.

[Sylvari]

Ragnarok is not a EU serveur >< it s for everyone.

1- Only ragnarok is open so all new player will come on this serveur in first.

2- then all other server r full but there r lot of inactive character, on ragnarok all players play often

Come on ragnarok we can change this world together ^^

I think your mistaking this server merge, The servers ain't technically full, they're just at the amount of players in which SE wants them. After the merger ppl will be able to create a new character on any server they want, none of them would be full from the current population of this game. Although you would be correct to assume that there would be no inactive players on Ragnarok as ppl have to specifically choose to go there to be on that server. But Ragnarok will most probably have the least amount of players out of all the servers due to it being a brand new server.

I also agree with Yowyow's view, If they never marked it as a RP server at the start or a EU server now and just left it as a 'New' server then the name alone and the chance to be on a fresh server with no rmt or inflated prices would have certainly pulled in quite a few ppl. I personally love the name Excalibur, But i just really love the tale behind the sword..

[Delsus]

I think your mistaking this server merge, The servers ain't technically full, they're just at the amount of players in which SE wants them. After the merger ppl will be able to create a new character on any server they want, none of them would be full from the current population of this game. Although you would be correct to assume that there would be no inactive players on Ragnarok as ppl have to specifically choose to go there to be on that server. But Ragnarok will most probably have the least amount of players out of all the servers due to it being a brand new server.

I also agree with Yowyow's view, If they never marked it as a RP server at the start or a EU server now and just left it as a 'New' server then the name alone and the chance to be on a fresh server with no rmt or inflated prices would have certainly pulled in quite a few ppl. I personally love the name Excalibur, But i just really love the tale behind the sword..

This post is too full of logic to be on these forums.

Btw love the sig Charmander ftw