I'm a bit confused, how does not doing sidequest/optional content considered abuse?
If I didn't do any sidequest/optional content, shouldn't that "punish" me instead?
I'll have less content on my roulette pool, thus longer queue time for me.
I would like to emphasize that I didn't mean the option to pick what duties to exclude from the roulette, just the option to exclude not yet completed duties.
I'm assuming if people unlock any optional duty, they plan to complete it.
If I didn't care about a certain optional duty/content, I wouldn't even touch the NPC.
(I personally haven't found any situation/reason where I'd unlock an optional content but don't want to complete it, if there's any that people actually do, please let me know)
In my opinion, putting not yet completed duties inside roulette pool doesn't really make sense.
If someone want to complete a duty that they've unlocked (but not yet completed), they'd queue that particular duty directly anyway.
And the roulette is there to incentivize people to "help" them.
I assume you mean the roulette should require unlocking all duties, including optional ones.
So, only people who unlock everything can access the roulette? How is this any good for the game?
I understand if your point of view is "roulette is to incentivize people to login daily" etc., but roulette is also there to incentivize people to "help" others who want to complete their duty with matchmaking.
If you make it so that only those who unlocked all duties can use the roulette, you'll reduce the amount of people they can matchmake with, longer queue time for them, and for you too cause there'll be less people who can use said roulette.
I knew this is coming.. I could also think of a 'simply...' solution for what you think is an abuse of the roulette system, but it'll most likely just goes back and forth and turn nasty, so I'll stop there.