
Originally Posted by
Rokke
Yes, the diversity was for the games health and that their popularity/lack of wasn’t a make or break deal for the animal heads. If they had wanted to just make money and call it a day it would have been far, far easier/profitable to have simply rolled out the m/f viera together lol
I don't see why to go all out for one gender and water down their counterpart. Could you not use your justification of luring over the wow players that use female avatars with a beastgirl instead of taller miqote?
You're missing what I'm trying to say, it seems.
They didn't add "Diversity!" for diversity's sake, they added them for "game health" and my assessment is that that's another way of saying "a calculated attempt to draw in people who play MMOs overseas". That IS an attempt to make more money ... because if you can convince, say, 18K WoW players to come play FF14 because Hrothgar reminds them of w/e in WoW, then that's 20K new players who are paying monthly. That's growth and more money.
If we're looking at WoW then cool. I don't want to stereotype WoW as I don't play it, but it's a game with a lot of "ugly/ hard/ goofy/ non-human" races. It's also a Male dominated game, as like 60% of all player characters are dudes last I checked. It's not shocking at all that many WoW converts go to Highlander Males and Hrothgar (They are almost at the same population level last I saw, impressive given how boned Hrothgar CC options are).
But females? Female of those types of races are not as popular as males. Google searched and found these numbers...
The List - Every race along with the percentage of that race that are female (sorted highest to lowest)
Nightborne - 73.9%
Void Elf - 70.7%
Lightforged Draenei - 67.9%
Draenei - 64.9%
Blood Elf - 58.1%
Night Elf - 57.3%
Pandaren (A) - 45.3%
Pandaren (H) - 44.9%
Gnome - 44.9%
Human - 44.2%
Goblin - 36.1%
Troll - 35.3%
Worgen - 29.1%
Mag'har Orc - 27.8%
Dark Iron Dwarf - 25.4%
Undead - 25.3%
Orc - 20.8%
Highmountain Tauren - 19.7%
Tauren - 16.1%
Dwarf - 15%
Can also look at GW2 at a time when it was doing well and see that Male Charr were close to being the 2nd most popular males in the game, yet the females were dead last.
One thing that seems universally true regardless of East or West is that players prefer females to look "cute/ attractive/ beautiful".
So for your last point ... would SE think that there's a market of people who want beast faced females worth going for or appealing to? Everything shows that people are more willing to play "weird looking" dudes far more than they're willing to play "weird looking" females, after all.
That's a question for SE to answer, but it's been clear what type of females people enjoy regardless of game. And again, I am furry and hate looking at these games because all their furry races lean more into "Monster people" than attractive furries ... but I can't find anything that would suggest that an attractive Furry Female would do any better than anything, as no one makes em.
So yeah, long-winded way of saying "people are far more likely to play the dudes than the females" when it comes to non-human faces.