Told you we'd get screwed.

[Aword3213]

Main hand is probably as best a criteria as one can get, even if people who have content on farm will get those for basically all jobs they have leveled.

Let's be honest here though, there will never be a time where nobody plays healer, because then you simply wouldn't get anything done ever.

Someone will always have to play a healer for their dungeons or their static, even if they absolutely despise playing it.

that can be true, but can it really be higher than tanks when healers suck so bad?

if you look at MH Item Level distribution, WHM is the highest among ALL jobs

SCH and AST are somewhere near middle but still higher than some DPS jobs

I know the part reason healers have higher average MH item level is because there're only 3 jobs, and I'm not saying healers don't deserve to change

What I want to say is current healers, despite we dislike it, actually appeal to larger player base

As long as healer population remain as it is now, or even go higher in EW, it's less likely that the healer design get changed.

[Reiryuu]

What I want to say is current healers, despite we dislike it, actually appeal to larger player base

Appeal is a strong word, and we have no way of affirming that, really. WHM is a super simple job that's popular for dungeon farming... since it's a healer it gets decent queue times and that means people might have a high ilvl main weapon just so that they can use the job to farm tomestones. SCH levels with SMN so those who like SMN and want to level it will automatically level SCH as well. Why not slap a high level book on the scholar if you get one just... in case... you might play it maybe? *shrug*. Anyway, neither I nor anyone here can know why all these people got a weapon on a healing class. But just because they do doesn't necessarily mean the job appeals to them to main.

[Aword3213]

Appeal is a strong word, and we have no way of affirming that, really. WHM is a super simple job that's popular for dungeon farming... since it's a healer it gets decent queue times and that means people might have a high ilvl main weapon just so that they can use the job to farm tomestones. SCH levels with SMN so those who like SMN and want to level it will automatically level SCH as well. Why not slap a high level book on the scholar if you get one just... in case... you might play it maybe? *shrug*. Anyway, neither I nor anyone here can know why all these people got a weapon on a healing class. But just because they do doesn't necessarily mean the job appeals to them to main.

and go through all the relic questline just for that?

some people would do this, some people wouldn't

Also those websites list every tier of IL distribution on all jobs and are categorized by date and month .

So you mean healers obtain their highest IL faster than most jobs just because the majority of people might one day play healers?

[Saefinn]

that can be true, but can it really be higher than tanks when healers suck so bad?

if you look at MH Item Level distribution, WHM is the highest among ALL jobs

SCH and AST are somewhere near middle but still higher than some DPS jobs

I know the part reason healers have higher average MH item level is because there're only 3 jobs, and I'm not saying healers don't deserve to change

What I want to say is current healers, despite we dislike it, actually appeal to larger player base

As long as healer population remain as it is now, or even go higher in EW, it's less likely that the healer design get changed.

From opinion polls I've seen, SCH has always been very low with AST also being low, but higher than SCH and WHM in a better place. WHM is simple and fluid and there's a demographic for that, even if I think there is some room to still satisfy those bored with it.

I don't think using how many people are playing healers or are maining healers as a good metric for how people feel about them. Because some people are healers at heart, healing is their comfort zones, they may be healers for their static or in their friend groups and so on, so these are all factors that will skew results. Like if you take me, my group has 3 people who are healer players, two of us find we're not having a lot of fun and the third still has complaints but not as much. So the two of us who aren't having too much fun swap places from time to time. Healing is also my comfort zone and always my preferred role in an MMO, so it's something very hard to let go and I tried in ShB. I was able to at least find some consolation in swapping from SCH to AST.

Opinion polls I think are better, but the downside is there's no official one that's been done. People on reddit have done them, but one can still argue a sample bias. I think the kind of data you're looking at makes more sense if you're looking at it within the scope of a role and not overall jobs, you'll still get your stubborn "I will still to my guns despite hating it" type, but it's a better indicator that more healers enjoy WHM versus SCH or AST. But it's no indicator that the current healers appeal to the larger play base.

[Aword3213]

From opinion polls I've seen, SCH has always been very low with AST also being low, but higher than SCH and WHM in a better place. WHM is simple and fluid and there's a demographic for that, even if I think there is some room to still satisfy those bored with it.

I don't think using how many people are playing healers or are maining healers as a good metric for how people feel about them. Because some people are healers at heart, healing is their comfort zones, they may be healers for their static or in their friend groups and so on, so these are all factors that will skew results. Like if you take me, my group has 3 people who are healer players, two of us find we're not having a lot of fun and the third still has complaints but not as much. So the two of us who aren't having too much fun swap places from time to time. Healing is also my comfort zone and always my preferred role in an MMO, so it's something very hard to let go and I tried in ShB. I was able to at least find some consolation in swapping from SCH to AST.

Opinion polls I think are better, but the downside is there's no official one that's been done. People on reddit have done them, but one can still argue a sample bias. I think the kind of data you're looking at makes more sense if you're looking at it within the scope of a role and not overall jobs, you'll still get your stubborn "I will still to my guns despite hating it" type, but it's a better indicator that more healers enjoy WHM versus SCH or AST. But it's no indicator that the current healers appeal to the larger play base.

I agree with you mostly. From the data we can get, it has flaws and can be biased, but it's the closest we can get.

But it's less likely for those who don't like healers to go through E12S or all the relic quest line to level their MH weapon first.

for people who would do them might as well level all their MH IL to the highest on all jobs, which don't affect the outcome.

Your story about healer is true and I agree with your sentiment

However, The polls you mentioned is no better because people content with current design are less likely to express their opinions and I believe there are still people who really like current healer design.

There are still people who switch to healers after ShB because they dislike the complexity and design of healers pre-ShB

[Saefinn]

I agree with you mostly. From the data we can get, it has flaws and can be biased, but it's the closest we can get.

But it's less likely for those who don't like healers to go through E12S or all the relic quest line to level their MH weapon first.

for people who would do them might as well level all their MH IL to the highest on all jobs, which don't affect the outcome.

Your story about healer is true and I agree with your sentiment

However, The polls you mentioned is no better because people content with current design are less likely to express their opinions and I believe there are still people who really like current healer design.

There are still people who switch to healers after ShB because they dislike the complexity and design of healers pre-ShB

There is another aspect to consider, using the highest tier is flawed too, because if anything, I would argue Savage tier is probably where you're most busy as a healer. I'm a semi casual and didn't do up to E12S but I did E4S and I had fun, it was a mix of the mechanics of the fight and in a progression scenario I had my work cut out for me because I am using my kit. I think it's fairly likely that people who are healers at heart & are savage tier players are going to put more investment into healing Savage content. So I'd find it plausible they would get their relic, some people do it because it's an achievement and some people do it simply for the glamour, when people say "glamour is the true endgame" it's not much of an exaggeration, people will pool hours of resources to get the thing they like the look of. Look at the measures you have to go through to get the Ozma mount.

Anyway this is only a small section of the game's content and you'll find with my complaints they're mostly directed at healing outside of savage content, because as the semi casual player, Savage content is infrequent content. And even if it wasn't semi casual, I'd still need be doing all of the other content in the game.

And yes, people who are content are less likely to express their opinions, because people complained about healing when I was loving it and wish I had be around to give all the positive feedback and how great the design is. And it seems some of those complaints got addressed, but those who loved the original design and want an evolution on that have been dismissed by this live later (because they stated as such) and I'd not mind a different approach if it was just fun to play, like I'm pretty flexible but just don't bore me.

It is a hard one to gauge, and to be honest, I see no shame in the devs doing an official structured feedback poll with an incentive for completion. Reading forum posts, reading reddit, getting custom polls from select community, measuring satisfaction based on usage aren't great metrics. Sure, it's what we have, but they're not good ways of doing it.