Quote Originally Posted by Raasu View Post
(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A)depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B)is obscene; or
(2)
(A)depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B)lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
I commend your holy quest in seeking to purge the boards with the zeal of an Ishgardian Inquisitor of all those who lack the piety to continue posting here.

I cannot help but ponder, mayhap, that you have given those for whom hell most undoubtedly awaits, the ammunition they need to continue with their depravity with this snippet of American legal text.

Your quote would seem to make it Hydaelyn crystal clear that for a video game graphic of a minor to fall foul of the law, it must be guilty of sexually explicit conduct or be portrayed doing something kinky like BDSM.

And even then, it's fine so long as you can prove it has artistic merit.

That being the case, have you not just vindicated your enemy and proven that however odious or creepy it may be, something like a mod that just makes characters in the game naked (be they adult or child) is legal in the USA?

Perhaps it's time for you to log off (all your accounts) and call it a day?