Results 1 to 10 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Nepentha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    542
    Character
    Isrun Whitewood
    World
    Brynhildr
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Oshirigami View Post
    Some people have 3 or more houses on a world by having alts with 2 houses each due to being grandfathered in in the past.

    I don't understand why this is allowed while housing is such a limited resource.
    This would be such a simple band-aid to free up a few plots for people who have no house on their main. Some people are getting 3x or 4x or more houses for their subscription cost while others can't find an available plot for ONE. It is not any more fair to them that they're allowed to keep more houses than they should have due to having gotten them in the past than it is fair to not demolish inactive player houses.

    Give people 45 days to demolish houses on their alts, and if they have more than a single personal and a single FC house on their account for each World then auto-demolish the most recent plots for all the extras.
    The problem is you'd be punishing people for having characters in more than one FC. What happens if you just drop an alt into a friend's FC if both FCs have housing? Does their house get demolished because you're in there on an alt on the same server as your main's FC? I have alts in two other FCs on Brynhildr. Should my main FC, that I'm the FC leader of (a legit FC, not a shell, there's 18 distinct accounts in here) lose housing because I have alts in other FCs that have housing? Should my friends lose their FC houses just because I'm in there? Do I have to pull my alts out to prevent this?

    And SE isn't likely to go back on their word with grandfathering. It's done, it's decided. I understand your frustration, but honestly we need to push more for instanced housing than taking away grandfathered houses. Even if they did decide to go back on their word, it won't solve the issue. Sure, a few more people would have housing, but we'd still have a lot of players going without. On Balmung they don't even have apartments anymore! And with all of Crystal being considered preferred now, we're about to get an influx of players liek whoa.

    It's a no win situation, to be certain, and I hope it's a sobering eye opener to the FFXIV devs that this neighborhood idea is simply untenable in the long run.
    (5)
    Last edited by Nepentha; 08-25-2021 at 04:37 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Almagnus1 View Post
    Don't you have something better to do with your life?

  2. #2
    Player
    LaylaTsarra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    4,940
    Character
    Y'sira Kurai
    World
    Halicarnassus
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Nepentha View Post
    And SE isn't likely to go back on their word with grandfathering.
    Eacactly. They're not and the calling for it gets old. They will not penalize people for following the rules. Any new rule changes will affect new additions and not old. They made that decision and it's the right one.

    That's not to say things don't need to be fixed because multiple ownership of FC's by one account on the same server needs to be addressed big time.

    Given the recent explosion of new players I wouldn't be surprised to see big rule changes coming. I sincerely hope that alts being able to share houses is one of those. I don't think that one house per account is something that is completely out of the question anymore either.
    (2)
    Last edited by LaylaTsarra; 08-27-2021 at 09:04 PM.

  3. #3
    Player
    Jojoya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    9,091
    Character
    Jojoya Joya
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by LaylaTsarra View Post
    Given the recent explosion of new players I wouldn't be surprised to see big rule changes coming. I sincerely hope that alts being able to share houses is one of those. I don't think that one house per account is something that is completely out of the question anymore either.
    Unfortunately, rule changes/enforcement won't be enough to fix the system. It will always be a problem as long as supply lags behind player population.
    (0)